Knowledge, attitude, and practices about the seasonal influenza vaccination among healthcare workers in Srinagar, India

Abstract

Please cite this paper as: Bali NK et al. (2012) Knowledge, attitude, and practices about the seasonal influenza vaccination among healthcare workers in Srinagar, India. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 7(4), 540–545. Background Healthcare workers (HCWs) universally have a poor uptake of influenza vaccination. However, no data are available from India. Objective To explore knowledge, attitudes, and practices associated with influenza vaccination in HCWs in a temperate climate area in northern India. Patients and Methods A self‐administered questionnaire was offered to all HCWs in three major hospitals of Srinagar and information sought on motivations, perceptions, preferences and practices regarding influenza vaccination. Results Of the 1750 questionnaires received, 1421 (81%) were returned. Only 62 (4·4%) HCWs had ever received influenza vaccination even as 1348 (95%) believed that influenza poses adverse potential consequences for themselves or their contacts; 1144 (81%) were aware of a vaccine against influenza and 830 (58%) of its local availability. Reasons cited by 1359 participants for not being vaccinated included ignorance about vaccine availability (435; 32%), skepticism about efficacy (248; 18%), busy schedule (166; 12%), fear of side effects (70; 4%), and a perception of not being‐at‐risk (82; 6%). Sixty‐one percent (865) believed that vaccine programs are motivated by profit. Eighty‐eight percent opined for mandatory vaccination for HCWs caring for the high‐risk patients, as a part of ‘employee health program’. Most of the participants intended to get vaccinated in the current year even as 684 (48%) held that vaccines could cause unknown illness and 444 (31%) believed their adverse effects to be underreported. Conclusion Influenza vaccination coverage among HCWs is dismally low in Srinagar; poor knowledge of vaccine availability and misperceptions about vaccine effectiveness, fear of adverse effects and obliviousness to being‐at‐risk being important barriers. Multifaceted, adaptable measures need to be invoked urgently to increase the coverage.

Contribution of influenza to acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Kashmir, India, 2010–2012

“…The World Health Organization recommends influenza vaccination for groups at increased risk for severe influenza, such as persons with chronic lung disease, and influenza vaccination has been shown to reduce the incidence of COPD exacerbations . However, only 8% of patients in our study reported receiving influenza vaccine, consistent with limited data on uptake in other high‐risk groups in India . Our findings, along with emerging data on influenza virus circulation and influenza‐associated hospitalization incidence in other parts of India, suggest that influenza is a substantial contributor to severe respiratory illness in India and that recommendations for influenza vaccination in certain high‐risk groups may be warranted.…”

Performance of rapid influenza diagnostic tests (QuickVue) for Influenza A and B Infection in India

“…[6,8] Immediately following the pandemic in 2009, we reported that pandemic and seasonal influenza viruses contribute significantly to respiratory illness in the northern Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir [8,9] where uptake of influenza vaccination is poor, even in high-risk populations. [10] …”

Vaccination of healthcare workers: A review

“…In this regard, relevant organizational factors include the distribution of free vaccines 59,63 and the ability to arrange immunization at convenient times. 68,75 Policies to increase influenza vaccination rates Different strategies are being adopted in hospitals worldwide to increase influenza vaccination rates among HCWs. Free vaccines, on-site vaccinations, mobile vaccination carts, walk-in vaccinations, educational materials, communication campaigns and declination forms have had a limited effect of less than 10 points in vaccination coverage, 57,76,77 with 1 exception yielding a 18 percentage point increase, 78 possibly due to the distribution of vaccine kits in units for on-site vaccination of colleagues.…”