Knowledge and the Climate Change Issue: An Exploratory Study of Cluster and Extra-Cluster Effects

Abstract

Climate change, while potentially impacting many industries, appears to have considerable significance to the wine industry. Yet little is known about how firms acquire knowledge and gain an understanding of climate change and its impacts. This study, exploratory in nature and studying firms from the wine-producing region of Tasmania, is one of the first in the management literature to use cluster theory to examine the climate change issue. Firms are predicted to exchange knowledge about climate change more readily with other firms internal to the subcluster than with those external to the sub-cluster. The hypothesis does not find support. The study also proposes that the different characteristics of knowledge can either increase or decrease their flows in and around clusters. Specifically, ''public'' knowledge about climate change is predicted to flow more freely than ''private'' knowledge about climate change. The hypothesis does not find support. Finally, firms are expected to acquire knowledge about climate change from sources other than clusterentrenched firms, and in particular peak national industry bodies. The hypothesis finds partial support. A discussion of the findings is presented along with future research directions.

Training Between Neighbors: Can a Successful Training System Be Developed Between Companies Located in the Same Locality?

“…It may also result in advantages of common ownership, incentives, and innovation, as well as economies of scale and other cost reductions. Maskell remarked on this point, "most of the advantages in relation to the skills developed in the local market might be just as big or small for 20 co-localized firms of a given size as for a single firm, 20 times bigger" (Maskell, 2001, p. 97; similar comments are made by Galbreath et al, 2014).…”

“…The cluster could evolve a selective/adoptive/innovative mechanism that creates the common training system by a process of selection, imitation, variation, and monitoring of identified solutions (Maskell, 2001, p. 930;Galbreath et al, 2014). At the same time, this process cannot abandon an individual perspective: the training offer must be aligned with the self-defined objectives of each enterprise, facilitated or delimited as this may be by a specific institutional endowment.…”

The responsibility of ensuring food security: a cross-country study on reducing the impact of agricultural industries on vulnerability to climate change

“…To reduce vulnerability to climate change, knowledge and innovation are crucial for identifying novel ways of production and implementing change (Galbreath et al, 2014). Innovation has long been essential to generating new ideas and technologies (March, 1991).…”

“…To reduce vulnerability to climate change, knowledge and innovation are crucial for identifying novel ways of production and implementing change (Galbreath et al , 2014). Knowledge drives innovation to address problems that require diverse perspectives, such as decoupling greenhouse gas emissions and industrial-scale agricultural industries, and managing the change required for adopting new practices (Ward et al , 2016).…”

Accountability for climate change: a research synthesis through the lenses of the integrated thinking approach

“…Competition and collaboration amongst firms are even crucial in promoting an understanding of climate change and its aftermaths. Analysing cluster and extra-cluster effects within the wine industry, Galbreath et al (2014) found that firms acquire knowledge around climate issues both from a variety of exchanges with other firms and from other knowledge sources.…”