2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2017.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowing What the Patron Wants: Using Predictive Analytics to Transform Library Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the library's adoption of an artificial intelligence system can replace the function of a library assistant that leads the patrons to the reading rooms to quest the book's precise position. The submission of Litsey and Mauldin (2018) supports this claim. He concludes that the library can use machine learning predictive analytic tools to analyse various data points to predict services and actions that can help user's services.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the library's adoption of an artificial intelligence system can replace the function of a library assistant that leads the patrons to the reading rooms to quest the book's precise position. The submission of Litsey and Mauldin (2018) supports this claim. He concludes that the library can use machine learning predictive analytic tools to analyse various data points to predict services and actions that can help user's services.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…For instance, the library's adoption of an artificial intelligence system can replace the function of a library assistant that leads the patrons to the reading rooms to quest the book's precise position. The submission of Litsey and Mauldin (2018) analytic tools to analyse various data points to predict services and actions that can help user's services. Hence, intelligent systems offer a means of knowing the statistics of user's activities in the library building at any point in time.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review showed examples of exploitation in 11 papers (code U-2, 11/126 papers), whereby the data provided by patrons are used to analyse users' satisfaction (Ochilbek, 2019;Yue & Jia, 2008) or to make predictions concerning future requests (Litsey & Mauldin, 2018). Facebook posts from patrons can also be used to predict responses to different types of library posts (Gruss et al, 2020).…”
Section: Role Of the Usermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Schreur (2020: 479) argues that the full adoption of AI into the technical services workflow will likely depend on a significant advance in linked data, he asserts that many “routine and repetitive” tasks could be automated. At the administrative level, there is interest in using AI as a predictive tool for assessing usage, which could inform the more efficient use of budgets and outreach efforts (Litsey and Mauldin, 2018; Renaud et al, 2015; Walker and Jiang, 2019). However, the reality of AI in libraries does not seem to have lived up to its initial promise at this point, and the previous examples seem to be exceptions to a general state of adoption rather than evidence of widespread adoption.…”
Section: Ai For Resource Description and Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%