2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.92.040406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Klein Paradox in Spatial and Temporal Resolution

Abstract: Based on spatially and temporally resolved numerical solutions to the relativistic quantum field equations, we provide a resolution to the controversial issue of how an incoming electron scatters off a supercritical potential step and how the electron-positron pair production is affected by this collision. The treatment of the problem as a correlated three-particle problem suggests revealing insight into the process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
139
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relativistic effect can be attributed to the fact that a sufficiently strong potential, being repulsive for electrons, is attractive for positrons and results in positron states inside the barrier, which align in energy with the electron continuum outside 4,5,6 . Matching between electron and positron wavefunctions across the barrier leads to the high-probability tunneling described by the Klein paradox 7 . The essential feature of QED responsible for the effect is the fact that states at positive and negative energies (electrons and positrons)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relativistic effect can be attributed to the fact that a sufficiently strong potential, being repulsive for electrons, is attractive for positrons and results in positron states inside the barrier, which align in energy with the electron continuum outside 4,5,6 . Matching between electron and positron wavefunctions across the barrier leads to the high-probability tunneling described by the Klein paradox 7 . The essential feature of QED responsible for the effect is the fact that states at positive and negative energies (electrons and positrons)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1). It is valid for the energy regime c 2 <E<V-c 2 with V>2c 2 , at which a portion of the wave function (modeling an incoming particle) can actually penetrate the potential barrier of total height V. This purely mathematical transmission, however, does not mean that an actual physical electron can pass through this barrier as its energy E is less than the barrier height V. This mathematical property of the Dirac (and also of the Klein-Gordon) equations is related to the famous Klein paradox [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: The Pair Creation Rate and Its Relationship To The Transmissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, this initial growth can be viewed as the result of an incoherent process due to each (subcritical) electric field pulse, where the created particles at one force location do not have sufficient time to affect the creation process (via Pauli blocking [27,28,32]) at the other location.…”
Section: Quantum Field Theoretical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It presumes a constructive quantum interference between an incoming electron (e) and a hole (h) moving inside the graphene barrier in a reverse direction and is characterized by the same pseudospin as sketched in Fig. 1(c) (Klein paradox [8,9]). The interference pattern resulting from the chiral tunneling is very sensitive to the phase difference ϕ between the e and h wavefunctions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%