1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1017091407556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the establishment of submerged macrophytes or an increase in turbidity, visual cues become less reliable as guides for prey consumption (Brönmark and Hansson 2012). Submerged macrophytes provide structural complexity that increases refuge availability for prey (Savino and Stein 1982;Stansfield et al 1997) and limits the swimming movement of certain predators (Diehl 1988). Turbidity decreases the contrast between the background and the prey (Utne-Palm 1999), providing a visual refuge (Jacobsen et al 2004;Ranåker et al 2012) by making prey less noticeable and decreasing the predator's reaction distance (Confer et al 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the establishment of submerged macrophytes or an increase in turbidity, visual cues become less reliable as guides for prey consumption (Brönmark and Hansson 2012). Submerged macrophytes provide structural complexity that increases refuge availability for prey (Savino and Stein 1982;Stansfield et al 1997) and limits the swimming movement of certain predators (Diehl 1988). Turbidity decreases the contrast between the background and the prey (Utne-Palm 1999), providing a visual refuge (Jacobsen et al 2004;Ranåker et al 2012) by making prey less noticeable and decreasing the predator's reaction distance (Confer et al 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial distribution of two cladoceran species, especially those with restricted niches, allow us to understand biodiversity responses of wetland littorals under changing limnological regimes.Furthermore, the morphology of the macrophytes has a significant bearing upon the availability of zooplankton as a food source, because of detritus tapping [14], and the growth of periphytic algae [15]. Consequently, the development of various macrophytes in wetlands leads to diverse cladoceran communities, and supports abundant cladoceran populations [16,17]. The heterogeneous structure of the vegetated habitat has also been demonstrated to affect the abundance of cladoceran species [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the complex structure of macrophytes can lower the predatory pressure by reducing predator feeding efficiency [12,23], and protects cladocerans against hydrological disturbance such as rainfall and high water velocity [24]. Additionally, the fecundity of cladocerans can increase because of a relatively higher availability of food in the complexly vegetated habitat, which results in the active selection of complex macrophyte species as cladoceran habitat [25].The majority of studies that have focused on the interactions between macrophytes and cladocerans have considered the role of submerged macrophytes [17,26]. These studies argued that submerged macrophytes were capable of providing a suitable habitat for cladocerans (e.g., daphniids) due to an increase of refuge space in the water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a shallower lake, if compared to Bonita lake, submerged and rooted macrophyte tend to predominate and can provide a suitable habitat for colonization by zooplankton, as discussed by Meerhoff et al (2006). These submerged macrophytes can enhance the refuge of zooplankton threatened by predators, and high phosphorus concentration can indicate food items (Stansfield et al, 1997;Muylaert et al, 2010;Choi et al, 2014).…”
Section: Factors That Structure the Alpha Diversity Of Zooplankton Comentioning
confidence: 99%