Through litter decomposition enormous amounts of carbon is emitted to the atmosphere. Numerous large-scale decomposition experiments have been conducted focusing on this fundamental soil process in order to understand the controls on the terrestrial carbon transfer to the atmosphere. However, previous studies were mostly based on site-specific litter and methodologies, adding major uncertainty to syntheses, comparisons and meta-analyses across different experiments and sites. In the TeaComposition initiative, the potential litter decomposition is investigated by using standardized substrates (Rooibos and Green tea) for comparison of litter mass loss at 336 sites (ranging from -9 to +26 °C MAT and from 60 to 3113 mm MAP) across different ecosystems. In this study we tested the effect of climate (temperature and moisture), litter type and land-use on early stage decomposition (3 months) across nine biomes. We show that litter quality was the predominant controlling factor in early stage litter decomposition, which explained about 65% of the variability in litter decomposition at a global scale. The effect of climate, on the other hand, was not litter specific and explained <0.5% of the variation for Green tea and 5% for Rooibos tea, and was of significance only under unfavorable decomposition conditions (i.e. xeric versus mesic environments). When the data were aggregated at the biome scale, climate played a significant role on decomposition of both litter types (explaining 64% of the variation for Green tea and 72% for Rooibos tea). No significant effect of land-use on early stage litter decomposition was noted within the temperate biome. Our results indicate that multiple drivers are affecting early stage litter mass loss with litter quality being dominant. In order to be able to quantify the relative importance of the different drivers over time, long-term studies combined with experimental trials are needed.

No abstract

Aim Evaluating how groups of organisms vary in dispersal capability and how environmental, spatial and temporal signals vary across multiple scales is critical to elucidating metacommunity theory. We examined whether the relative contributions of environmental, spatial and hydrological factors have different effects on organismal groups with different dispersal abilities at three spatial scales, and how this knowledge contributes to our understanding of metacommunity dynamics. Location Four major Brazilian floodplains, with the largest distance among them of 2,300 Km. Taxon 10 aquatic organismal groups, ranging from bacterioplankton to fish. Methods We sampled lakes connected to the main river in the low‐ and high‐water periods of each floodplain between 2011 and 2012. Different biological groups were analysed across three hierarchical spatial scales (fine, intermediate and subcontinental) within and between floodplain systems. We applied a series of partial redundancy analyses to estimate the relative contributions of environmental factors, spatial factors and hydrological period for each biological group. Results At the fine spatial scale, predominantly environmental factors and hydrological period structure metacommunities, although less so for microorganisms than for micro‐invertebrates and macro‐organisms. The relative importance of environmental factors increased at the intermediate spatial scale. At the subcontinental scale, the relative importance of spatial factors increased for all biological groups, but environmental factors remained the primary regulators of microorganisms even at the largest scale. Main conclusions This study design allowed us to make more robust inferences about the mechanisms responsible for regulating community structure of distinct biological groups at different spatial scales. Our results suggest that biological groups displaying distinct body size likely determine the spatial extent at which environmental, spatial and hydrological processes prevail as the primary regulators of community structure. These findings are important in guiding the conservation and management of floodplain biodiversity because these systems are naturally highly heterogeneous in space and time.

No abstract

Summary In aquatic systems, many species rely primarily on visual cues to choose optimal foraging sites, capture prey and avoid potential threats. Increases in the turbidity of water reduce visibility and impede animals in determining the precise location of both predators and food. How individuals balance foraging decisions with anti‐predator behaviour in turbid environments is not well understood. We tested the effects of turbidity and predation risk on the foraging behaviour and feeding of an invertivorous fish, Moenkhausia forestii (Characidae), using a mesocosm experiment with a 2 × 2 design, crossing water clarity (clear versus turbid) with predation risk as reflected by the presence or absence of the piscivorous wolf‐fish Hoplias aff. malabaricus (Erythrinidae). We predicted that turbidity and predator presence would interact additively to reduce foraging rates, and that increased turbidity or predator presence would result in disproportionate food partitioning among shoal members. The combination of high turbidity and predator presence resulted in a significant reduction in prey consumption. Foraging success exhibited a skewed distribution in the turbid treatment, i.e. there was a decreased evenness of food partitioning within shoals. Hence, both turbidity and predator presence affect the prey consumption and foraging behaviour of invertivorous fish, with turbidity amplifying the non‐lethal effects of predation risk on foraging success. Our results imply that turbidity‐induced visual obstruction amplifies the negative effects of predator presence on invertivorous fish feeding behaviour, resulting in higher prey survival. Also, our finding that food intake by an intermediate consumer decreased in turbid water with a top predator lends no support to the hypothesis that intermediate consumer fish reduce their anti‐predator behaviour in turbid water. From a management perspective, our findings suggest that the oligotrophication of aquatic systems could dramatically increase predation on basal prey organisms naturally adapted to turbid waters, and reduce within‐shoal differences in feeding behaviour.