Kişisel Rehberlik

Do parents have exam anxiety, too? The predictive role of irrational beliefs and perfectionism with parental exam anxiety in explaining students’ exam anxiety

“…Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale ( FMPS ). This scale was developed by Frost et al (1990) and adapted into Turkish by Özbay and Mısırlı-Taşdemir (2003) by applying to high-school students. This 5-point Likert-type scale consists of 35 items grouped in six subscales, namely ‘ concern over mistakes (sample item: ‘If I fail partly, it is as bad as being a complete failure’) , parental criticism (sample item: ‘My parents never tried to understand my mistakes’), doubting of actions (sample item: ‘I usually have doubts about the simple everyday things I do’) , parental expectations (sample item: ‘My parents set very high standards for me’) , personal standards (sample item: ‘ I set higher goals than most people’) , and organization (sample item: ‘ I try to be an organized person’)’.…”

“…This 5-point Likert-type scale consists of 35 items grouped in six subscales, namely ‘ concern over mistakes (sample item: ‘If I fail partly, it is as bad as being a complete failure’) , parental criticism (sample item: ‘My parents never tried to understand my mistakes’), doubting of actions (sample item: ‘I usually have doubts about the simple everyday things I do’) , parental expectations (sample item: ‘My parents set very high standards for me’) , personal standards (sample item: ‘ I set higher goals than most people’) , and organization (sample item: ‘ I try to be an organized person’)’. The results of the EFA conducted for validity assessment showed that all scale items were grouped in six subscales and these subscales explained 47.8% of the total variance (Özbay & Mısırlı-Taşdemir, 2003). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for subscales varied between .61 and .87, and was calculated as .83 for the total scale (Özbay & Mısırlı-Taşdemir, 2003) Similarly, in the current study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the subscales varied between .60 and .87, and .85 for the total scale.…”

“…The results of the EFA conducted for validity assessment showed that all scale items were grouped in six subscales and these subscales explained 47.8% of the total variance (Özbay & Mısırlı-Taşdemir, 2003). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for subscales varied between .61 and .87, and was calculated as .83 for the total scale (Özbay & Mısırlı-Taşdemir, 2003) Similarly, in the current study, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the subscales varied between .60 and .87, and .85 for the total scale.…”

Hukuk Muhakemeleri̇ Kanunu Kapsaminda Hakem Kararlarinin İptali̇ Sebepleri̇ Ve Hâki̇mi̇n Karara Müdahalesi̇

“…Buna karşın, anılan hususlarda gerçekleşt r lecek tahk m yargılamasının yalnızca tarafl ar arasında sonuç doğuracağını düzenleyen tahk m anlaşmaları geçerl kabul ed l r155 . O hâlde, yalnızca tarafl arın üzer nde serbestçe tasarruf edeb lecekler haklarla lg l sulh olab lecekler uyuşmazlıkların tahk me elver şl olduğundan söz ed l r156 .Tahk me elver şl olmayan b r konu üzer nde hakem mahkemes nce karar ver lm ş olması hal nde bu karar, HMK m.439/2-g kapsamında ptal ed leb l r157 . Ayrıca bel rtel m k , uyuşmazlığın tahk me elver şl olup olmadığı b r ptal sebeb olarak tarafl arca ler sürülmese b le, tahk me elver şl l k kamu düzen nden sayıldığı ç n ptal davasına bakan mahkemen n bu sebeb re'sen ncelemes gerek r 158 .2.…”