Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2839462.2856535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kip3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Berrezueta-Guzman et al [7] created Atent@, a Robotic Assistant (RA), and a smart home environment that utilized data from two IoT devices (chair and desk) to support children with ADHD in their homework activities. Zuckerman et al [38] designed Kip3, a social robotic device that employs a tablet-based Continuous Performance Test (CPT) to assess inattention and impulsivity in college students with ADHD. Their initial evaluation suggested that Kip3 has the potential to help students regain focus, but questions remain about its long-term effectiveness and its ability to identify inattention in more complex, real-world situations.…”
Section: Technologies For Students With Adhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berrezueta-Guzman et al [7] created Atent@, a Robotic Assistant (RA), and a smart home environment that utilized data from two IoT devices (chair and desk) to support children with ADHD in their homework activities. Zuckerman et al [38] designed Kip3, a social robotic device that employs a tablet-based Continuous Performance Test (CPT) to assess inattention and impulsivity in college students with ADHD. Their initial evaluation suggested that Kip3 has the potential to help students regain focus, but questions remain about its long-term effectiveness and its ability to identify inattention in more complex, real-world situations.…”
Section: Technologies For Students With Adhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Table 1 shows the type of social robot implemented in each proposed system and the input signal or sensors used to assess the children’s behavior. Thus, eleven systems implemented humanoid robots like Nao [ 18 , 24 , 32 , 35 ], Silbot [ 25 , 31 ], Robotis Bioloid [ 36 ], Pepper [ 19 ], Sanbot Elf [ 37 , 38 ], and Ifbot [ 39 ], and just six systems implemented a social robot developed ad hoc [ 21 , 27 , 33 , 34 , 40 , 41 ]. Finally, we highlighted the type of environment used in each system.…”
Section: Study 1: Social Robots For Dealing With Adhdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we identified that the reported studies in the literature involved people with different characteristics. For instance, two studies involved just healthy children [ 35 , 41 ], one study involved undiagnosed children with potential symptoms of ADHD [ 21 , 25 , 31 , 36 ], six studies involved children living with ADHD and other developmental disorders [ 18 , 24 , 27 , 32 , 34 , 38 ], and three studies involved just children living with ADHD [ 19 , 37 , 40 ]. Table 2 shows the participants’ characteristics in each study case, such as the number of participants, age, gender, and health conditions.…”
Section: Study 1: Social Robots For Dealing With Adhdmentioning
confidence: 99%