1992
DOI: 10.1021/la00048a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of heterocoagulation. 3. Analysis of effects causing the discrepancy between the theory and experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are the other reports claiming that the repulsive force between silica surfaces is explained by the hydration of surfaces rather than by a gel layer (8,9). The existence of a thick structured layer is also suggested by coagulation experiments with silica dispersions (24) and rheological studies on silica and aluminum slurries (25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are the other reports claiming that the repulsive force between silica surfaces is explained by the hydration of surfaces rather than by a gel layer (8,9). The existence of a thick structured layer is also suggested by coagulation experiments with silica dispersions (24) and rheological studies on silica and aluminum slurries (25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[2]), is limited to systems for which both sets of primary particles have either identical or very close values of the scattering intensities associated with single (individual) particles at the angle of observation (6). For such systems, experiments are usually carried out for binary mixtures at a constant value of the total particle number concentration (N tot ), but varying the ratio (N 1 /N 2 ) of the two individual particle number concentrations.…”
Section: Background Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted earlier, show the low-pH region to be one of significant heteroagthe general analysis of McCormack et al (6) is used for the gregation, while at pH values above approximately 7 (near computation of the pair interaction potentials, and W 12 values the isoelectric point for the TiO 2 ), no significant heteroagare computed as in Eq. [3]. Measured zeta potentials are gregation is expected.…”
Section: And Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 86%