2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-010-0737-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of growth and caffeine demethylase production of Pseudomonas sp. in bioreactor

Abstract: The effect of various initial caffeine concentrations on growth and caffeine demethylase production by Pseudomonas sp. was studied in bioreactor. At initial concentration of 6.5 g l(-1) caffeine, Pseudomonas sp. showed a maximum specific growth rate of 0.2 h(-1), maximum degradation rate of 1.1 g h(-1), and caffeine demethylase activity of 18,762 U g CDW(-1) (CDW: cell dry weight). Caffeine degradation rate was 25 times higher in bioreactor than in shake flask. For the first time, we show highest degradation o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was maintained on caffeine associated sucrose (CAS) agar medium and subcultured once a week to prevent the loss of its caffeine-degrading ability. Under optimal growth condition in the bioreactor, this strain was found to degrade 100% caffeine with initial caffeine concentration of 20 g L -1 (Gummadi and Santhosh 2010). This was the best strain withstanding higher concentrations of caffeine reported so far.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 64%
“…It was maintained on caffeine associated sucrose (CAS) agar medium and subcultured once a week to prevent the loss of its caffeine-degrading ability. Under optimal growth condition in the bioreactor, this strain was found to degrade 100% caffeine with initial caffeine concentration of 20 g L -1 (Gummadi and Santhosh 2010). This was the best strain withstanding higher concentrations of caffeine reported so far.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 64%
“…Literature reports on the effect of carbon sources on caffeine degradation are inconclusive and with contradictions. The addition of sucrose, glucose and fructose were reported to enhance decaffeination by different organisms [12,32,33]. The possible reason for the differences in carbohydrate utilization by organisms of the same genera could be that the response is strain dependent.…”
Section: Effect Of Auxiliary Carbon and Nitrogen Source On Biodecaffementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Microbial and enzyme-based processes offer an environment friendly, cost effective, and sustainable alternative to chemical-based processes [12,13]. A great deal of work has been reported in literature regarding decaffeination using microorganisms both by bacterial cultures like Pseudomonas sp., Serratia, Rhodococcus, Klebsiella, and Leifsonia species [14][15][16][17] as well as by fungal strains such as Aspergillus, Penicillium, Trichosporon, and Fusarium sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P. putida NCIM5235 could degrade 59.9 -21.5% of the caffeine in a medium containing 7.5 -10 g/L caffeine (Dash and Gummadi, 2006) and this bacterium could degrade 100℅ of caffeine at 18 h when it was allowed to grow on a medium containing 6.4 g/L caffeine with 700 and 800 rpm aeration (Gummadi et al, 2009). It also could degrade 100% of caffeine on a medium contained 1 g/L caffeine after 15 h incubation (Gummadi and Devarai, 2010). Besides bacteria, another microorganism which also has the ability to degrade caffeine is Aspergillus tamarii V12A25.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%