1982
DOI: 10.1021/bi00539a027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of acyl-tRNA complexes of Escherichia coli phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase. A conformational change is rate limiting in catalysis

Abstract: Kinetics of complex formation between phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase and Phe-tRNAPhe have been measured by the stopped-flow technique. Either the protein intrinsic fluorescence or the fluorescence of the added indicator 6-(p-toluidinyl)naphthalene-2-sulfonate was observed. Identical results were obtained with each method. Acyl-tRNAs with variable structures of the acyl and tRNA moieties were examined. Kinetics were measured as a function of pH and at different ionic strengths. Kinetic constants were compared wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(83 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prevent hydrolysis of Tyr-tRNA Phe , an editing-defective PheRS variant (βA356W) was employed. Phe-tRNA Phe and Tyr-tRNA Phe showed no significant differences in any of the kinetic parameters measured (Figure 2C), and the constants were comparable to those previously measured for E. coli PheRS binding of Phe-tRNA Phe (Baltzinger and Holler, 1982). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To prevent hydrolysis of Tyr-tRNA Phe , an editing-defective PheRS variant (βA356W) was employed. Phe-tRNA Phe and Tyr-tRNA Phe showed no significant differences in any of the kinetic parameters measured (Figure 2C), and the constants were comparable to those previously measured for E. coli PheRS binding of Phe-tRNA Phe (Baltzinger and Holler, 1982). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In class II aaRSs such as AlaRS, PheRS, and ProRS, ami-noacyl-tRNA release is rapid and not rate limiting during aminoacylation, while the rate of aminoacylation by class I enzymes is limited by product release (Baltzinger and Holler, 1982; Ibba et al, 1995; Zhang et al, 2006). To examine whether these class-specific differences in activity also extend to the dissociation and rebinding of mischarged tRNAs, we investigated the impact of EF-Tu on editing by LeuRS (class I) (Lincecum et al, 2003) and ProRS (class II) (Beuning and Musier-Forsyth, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration dependence of k A yields a second-order rate constant of 1 Â 10 8 M À1 s À1 , which is less than the diffusion controlled limit for macromolecular interactions. 42 Similar¯uorescence transitions upon formation of RNA-protein complexes occurring at equally fast rates have also been observed in substrate binding by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (4 Â 10 7 M À1 s À1 ), 23,24 binding of the restriction enzyme EcoRV to its substrate (5 Â 10 7 M À1 s À1 ), 70 binding of the termination factor Rho to RNA Figure 10. Kinetic scheme for single turnover cleavage of R1.1 RNA by RNase III.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In addition to advancing our understanding of the RNase III mechanism the present study also provides, for the ®rst time, an assessment of conformational changes during substrate binding. Conformational changes appear to be a common aspect of RNA-protein interactions, and stopped-ow¯uorescence has been successfully used to study RNA-protein dynamics in several cases, 23,24,65,66 as well as for understanding RNA dynamics. 67 ± 69 We ®nd that there are conformational transitions associated with both binding and catalysis by RNase III (Figure 10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a conformational change has been observed during the aminoacylation reaction for several synthetases (Riesner et al, 1978;Kern & Gangloff, 1981;Holler et al, 1981; Baltzinger & Holler, 1982b;Beresten et al, 1983;Ferguson & Yang, 1986a) and for tRNA (Renaud et al, 1981;Lefevre et al, 1981;Yamashiro-Matsumara & Kawata, 1981;Ferguson & Yang, 1986b;Pelka & Schulman, 1986). It may be limiting (Baltzinger & Holler, 1982a). Finally, it is also conceivable that tRNATrp perturbs the activation step strongly enough to make this step a partially limiting factor in the overall reaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%