2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Resampling and Editing of Mischarged tRNA Prior to Translation Elongation

Abstract: SUMMARY Faithful translation of the genetic code depends on the GTPase EF-Tu delivering correctly charged aminoacyl-tRNAs to the ribosome for pairing with cognate codons. The accurate coupling of cognate amino acids and tRNAs by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases is achieved through a combination of substrate specificity and product editing. Once released by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, both cognate and near-cognate aminoacyl-tRNAs were considered to be committed to ribosomal protein synthesis through their associa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Product release is rapid in class II ARSs, unlike class I enzymes in which this step is rate limiting (41). Thus, class I ARSs remain bound to their substrates long enough to edit any misacylated tRNA before release and normally would not require proofreading by a trans-editing factor (42). In the assay demonstrating ThrRS protection, we also expect that class II ThrRS releases the substrate rapidly; however, ThrRS competes effectively with ProXp-ST1 and -ST2 in rebinding the cognate Thr-tRNA Thr substrate and therefore protects it from hydrolysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Product release is rapid in class II ARSs, unlike class I enzymes in which this step is rate limiting (41). Thus, class I ARSs remain bound to their substrates long enough to edit any misacylated tRNA before release and normally would not require proofreading by a trans-editing factor (42). In the assay demonstrating ThrRS protection, we also expect that class II ThrRS releases the substrate rapidly; however, ThrRS competes effectively with ProXp-ST1 and -ST2 in rebinding the cognate Thr-tRNA Thr substrate and therefore protects it from hydrolysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A trans-editing model has also been proposed for class II aaRSs. In this model, the misacylated tRNA is released from the enzyme but then undergoes hydrolysis after rebinding (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this pathway is naturally suppressed by fast deacylation of misacylated tRNA within the CP1-editing site in WT LeuRS, it may nonetheless represent a mopping up activity for any misacylated tRNAs that escape cis editing. A dissociation-reassociation pathway by which misacylated tRNAs are released and rebound by the aaRS editing domains has been proposed as a significant editing pathway for class II aaRSs (15). Explicit measurements of association and dissociation rates for cognate and noncognate aa-tRNAs for class I editing enzymes will offer more quantitative insight into this phenomenon.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this process, the aminoacyl-tRNA is released from the synthetase and bound by elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) 2 for delivery to the ribosome and use in protein synthesis (6,7). Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are usually highly selective for their cognate tRNA due to the availability of a large surface area for recognition, identity elements within the tRNA molecule itself, and also kinetic proofreading during the aminoacylation reaction (8 -10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%