2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2003.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of {311} defect dissolution in silicon-on-insulator (SOI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Reduced short channel effects, improved speed, and reduced power consumption in complementary metal oxide semiconductor devices are all achievable with these substrates. 2 An additional advantage of SOI consists of the possibility to reduce the number of silicon interstitials created during the source/drain implant steps by recombining them at the buried Si-SiO 2 interface, which results in a better control of several deleterious effects, such as extended defect formation, 3,4 dopant deactivation, 5 and transient enhanced diffusion ͑TED͒. 6 The behavior of the buried Si-SiO 2 interface with respect to the implant-generated interstitial excess has been a longstanding subject of research and, with the exception of a few reports suggesting that the interface has no impact at all on dopant diffusion 7 or acts has a reflective boundary for interstitials, 8 the vast majority of previous reports shows that it behaves as an efficient sink for interstitials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Reduced short channel effects, improved speed, and reduced power consumption in complementary metal oxide semiconductor devices are all achievable with these substrates. 2 An additional advantage of SOI consists of the possibility to reduce the number of silicon interstitials created during the source/drain implant steps by recombining them at the buried Si-SiO 2 interface, which results in a better control of several deleterious effects, such as extended defect formation, 3,4 dopant deactivation, 5 and transient enhanced diffusion ͑TED͒. 6 The behavior of the buried Si-SiO 2 interface with respect to the implant-generated interstitial excess has been a longstanding subject of research and, with the exception of a few reports suggesting that the interface has no impact at all on dopant diffusion 7 or acts has a reflective boundary for interstitials, 8 the vast majority of previous reports shows that it behaves as an efficient sink for interstitials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The behavior of the buried Si-SiO 2 interface with respect to the implant-generated interstitial excess has been a longstanding subject of research and, with the exception of a few reports suggesting that the interface has no impact at all on dopant diffusion 7 or acts has a reflective boundary for interstitials, 8 the vast majority of previous reports shows that it behaves as an efficient sink for interstitials. [3][4][5][6][9][10][11] Several physical phenomena have been investigated in these studies which give a more or less direct evidence of the interstitial recombination at the Si-SiO 2 interface. In some cases, a quantitative estimation of the recombination length for interstitials at the interface L int has also been given.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%