2021
DOI: 10.1002/iid3.583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics and persistence of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 neutralisation and antibodies after BNT162b2 vaccination in a Swiss cohort

Abstract: Introduction: Since the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), substantial effort has been made to gain knowledge about the immunity elicited by infection or vaccination. Methods: We studied the kinetics of antibodies and virus neutralisation induced by vaccination with BNT162b2 in a Swiss cohort of SARS-CoV-2 naïve (n = 40) and convalescent (n = 9) persons. Blood sera were analysed in a live virus neutralisation assay and specific IgG and IgA levels were measured by enzyme-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antibody presence increased in RD patients from weeks 1 to 9 after the second vaccination, demonstrating that RD patients need more time to seroconvert than in a recent study of healthy controls, where all seroconverted within 14 days of the first mRNA vaccination [ 41 ]. We need kinetic studies of antibody presence and levels in RD patients to avoid bias when comparing different studies of humoral responses to COVID-19, as the optimal timepoint for antibody measurement after vaccination in RD patients has not been established [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibody presence increased in RD patients from weeks 1 to 9 after the second vaccination, demonstrating that RD patients need more time to seroconvert than in a recent study of healthy controls, where all seroconverted within 14 days of the first mRNA vaccination [ 41 ]. We need kinetic studies of antibody presence and levels in RD patients to avoid bias when comparing different studies of humoral responses to COVID-19, as the optimal timepoint for antibody measurement after vaccination in RD patients has not been established [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the vaccines have the ability to trigger mucosal immune response, or whether the vaccine against COVID-19 triggered a robust humoral immunity is mostly unexpectable (Barda et al, 2021). In the scope of vaccination worldwide, the applicability of a highly robust antibody assay, to be considered a cost effective less invasive method was a target goal to be achieved to track community health immunity and measure the extent of success of vaccination strategy globally (Šošić et al, 2021, Cristiano et al, 2021, Makhoul et al, 2020. Based on the discussion, a reliable quantitative and neutralizing assay against SARS-COV-2 are crucial to follow up immune response to the vaccine, and such tests appears mandatory, if we can establish a link between the antibody titers and future shielding against reinfection was made possible (Ech-chaouy et al, 2021;Infantino et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%