2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.218004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Theory and Shear Viscosity of Dense Dipolar Hard Sphere Liquids

Abstract: Transport properties of dense fluids are fundamentally challenging, because the powerful approaches of equilibrium statistical physics cannot be applied. Polar fluids compound this problem, because the long-range interactions preclude the use of a simple effective diameter approach based solely on hard spheres. Here, we develop a kinetic theory for dipolar hard-sphere fluids that is valid up to high density. We derive a mathematical approximation for the radial distribution function at contact directly from th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(59 reference statements)
6
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a reduced temperature T * = k B T /ϵ = 1.5 in MD simulations this pseudo HS potential reproduces the theoretically predicted shear viscosity of HS fluids [21]. It has also been shown that it describes the HS component of DHS fluids [5] in simulations of viscosity. The long range dipole-dipole interaction potential is used as given in equation (3).…”
Section: Simulation Setupsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At a reduced temperature T * = k B T /ϵ = 1.5 in MD simulations this pseudo HS potential reproduces the theoretically predicted shear viscosity of HS fluids [21]. It has also been shown that it describes the HS component of DHS fluids [5] in simulations of viscosity. The long range dipole-dipole interaction potential is used as given in equation (3).…”
Section: Simulation Setupsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…where J n = (λ/n)(∂I n /∂λ) [5]. The RDF at contact for DHS from the equations above compares well to results of numerical simulations [5].…”
Section: Analytical Foundationsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations