2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2010.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic resolution of a drug precursor by Burkholderia cepacia lipase immobilized by different methodologies on superparamagnetic nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of magnetic nanoparticles as a support for enzyme immobilization has several advantages: (1) a higher specific surface area permitting the binding of a larger amount of enzymes; (2) the mass transfer resistance being relatively low; and (3) easy and selective separation of the immobilized enzyme from a reaction mixture by the application of a magnetic field [ 20 , 21 ]. Magnetic nanoparticles have been used for the immobilization of many enzymes, such as lipase [ 22 ], chitosanase [ 23 ], d -amino acid oxidase [ 24 ], β-galactosidase [ 25 ], and β-fructofuranosidase [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of magnetic nanoparticles as a support for enzyme immobilization has several advantages: (1) a higher specific surface area permitting the binding of a larger amount of enzymes; (2) the mass transfer resistance being relatively low; and (3) easy and selective separation of the immobilized enzyme from a reaction mixture by the application of a magnetic field [ 20 , 21 ]. Magnetic nanoparticles have been used for the immobilization of many enzymes, such as lipase [ 22 ], chitosanase [ 23 ], d -amino acid oxidase [ 24 ], β-galactosidase [ 25 ], and β-fructofuranosidase [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covalent attachment and physical adsorption are the two main routes applied for the immobilization of enzymes on different supports . Despite its rather simple nature, the direct adsorption of lypolytic enzymes such as TLL onto the functionalized surface of the nanoparticles is a much more appropriate method of immobilization than covalent attachment, which can inactivate the desired enzyme . On the other hand, TLL has only seven lysine residues, and the application of covalent attachment via the alteration of the amino group using epoxy, glyoxyl, and glutaraldehyde may be difficult to achieve .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming to immobilize CALB onto iron magnetic nanoparticles, the support was initially treated with γ-aminopropyltriethoxysilane solution, according to the methodology described by Netto et al (2009). After the treatment was finished, the cross-linking of the support was done with glutaraldehyde solution, as described by Andrade et al (2010). Once this was done, immobilization of the enzyme on the support was started by the contact of 0.01 g of magnetic nanoparticles with 0.5 mL of sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM and pH 7.0), the system was maintained under controlled stirring at 45 rpm.…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%