2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1382-6689(02)00010-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic parameters of OPT pesticide desulfuration by c-DNA expressed human CYPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preliminary Studies. The absence of nonspecific esterases in Supersome preparations that could interfere with AChE activity determination has been previously shown (Buratti et al, 2002). The direct inhibition of AChE activity, due to unmetabolized malathion or impurities, was measured in standard incubations of control Supersomes in the absence of NADP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Preliminary Studies. The absence of nonspecific esterases in Supersome preparations that could interfere with AChE activity determination has been previously shown (Buratti et al, 2002). The direct inhibition of AChE activity, due to unmetabolized malathion or impurities, was measured in standard incubations of control Supersomes in the absence of NADP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been suggested that in vitro concentrations of OPTs Յ10 M are the most appropriate to mimic in vivo conditions (Buratti et al, 2002, based on chlorpyrifos plasma concentrations (90 nM) measured in human volunteers (Nolan et al, 1984) and on the estimation of environmental exposure in U.S. adults and children (about 1.4 -1.61 g/kg/day) (Schurdut et al, 1998;Rigas et al, 2001), obtained by applying pharmacokinetic models to biomonitoring data. On the same line, starting from urinary alkylphosphate levels, a body burden of 208 g/kg azinphos-methyl (corresponding to 6.5 M in plasma) was estimated in orchard workers at the steady state (Carrier and Brunet, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations