Kinetic analysis of biohydrogen production from anaerobically treated POME in bioreactor under optimized condition

Rasdi, Zatilfarihiah; Mumtaz, Tabassum; Rahman, Nor'aini Abdul; Hassan, Mohd Ali

doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.095

Cited by 31 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These results indicated that the thermophilic temperature had a positive effect on the acidification of organic wastes and lead in an increased acetic acid and butyric acid production. Similar results were previously reported by O-Thong et al [13,19] and Thomas et al [20]. It has been reported that the formation of acetate and butyrate resulted in higher biohydrogen production which was evident in this study.…”

Section: Hydrogen Production On Cstr Semisupporting

confidence: 93%

Comparison of ASBR and CSTR reactor for hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent under thermophilic condition

Seengenyoung¹,

O‐Thong²,

Prasertsan³

2014

ABB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) by Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2 was investigated both in batch and continuous reactors using anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (ASBR) and continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). The hydrogen production determined from batch experiment of POME at an inoculum size of 0%, 10%, 20% and 30% (v/v) was 161, 201, 246 and 296 mL H 2 /g-COD with COD removal efficiency of 21%, 23%, 23% and 23%, respectively. Continuous hydrogen production was start-up with 30% (v/v) inoculum in both ASBR and CSTR reactors and more than 30% COD removal could be obtained at HRT of 4 days, corresponding to OLR of 11.3 g COD/ L·day. Similar hydrogen production rates of 2.05 and 2.16 L H 2 /L. day were obtained from ASBR and CSTR, respectively. COD removal efficiency of ASBR was 37.7%, while it was 44.8% for CSTR. However, ASBR was stable in term of alkalinity, while the CSTR was stable in term of hydrogen production, soluble metabolites concentration and alkalinity. Therefore, the CSTR was found to be more stable in hydrogen production than ASBR under the same OLR.

show abstract

Section: Hydrogen Production On Cstr Semisupporting

confidence: 93%

Comparison of ASBR and CSTR reactor for hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent under thermophilic condition

Seengenyoung¹,

O‐Thong²,

Prasertsan³

2014

ABB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Lower hydrogen production at a shorter HRT (6 hours) could result from a shift in the metabolic pathway [39,40]. On the contrary, Kumar et al [41] found that 2 days (24 hours) HRT gives the best performance of ASBR for digestion of de-oiled jatropha waste with minimum HRT being 1.5 days (36 hours) where the hydrogen production drop. Badiei et al [42], found that the highest hydrogen production rate was achieved at HRT 72 hours using diluted POME as a substrate in an ASBR system with minimum HRT of 36 hours.…”

Section: Results and Discussion 61 Kinetic Model Evaluationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kinetic Model of Thermophilic Biohydrogen Production from POME

Jahim

Abdul

Chu

et al. 2019

IJIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study of fermentation kinetic parameters are crucial to understand the environmental factors affect on biohydrogen production. Kinetic models for hydrogen production from anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent (POME) by mixed culture were developed based on published work. The models accounted for substrate limitation, substrate inhibition, hydrogen production, and endogenous decay rate. Data from previous literature were used to compare four microbial growth kinetic models for hydrogen production in an ASBR system. The estimated values of the maximum specific growth rate (μm) were found to be 0.371 h-1. In this study, the parameters of Y, kd, and B0 calculated were 2.64 gVSS/gCOD, 0.053 h-1 , and 0.133 L H2/gCOD, respectively. The model fitting was found to be in good agreement with the experimental and can be utilized for the optimization and design of the process.

show abstract

“…and Thermoanaerobacterium spp. qPCR Leaño et al ( 2012 ) Thermoanaerobacterium -rich sludge ND CSTR 60 °C Initial = 5.5, Operation = uncontrolled ND 4.2 L H 2 /L POME ND T. thermosaccharolyticum, T. aciditolerans PCR-DGGE Mamimin et al ( 2012 ) POME digested sludge HT, 85 °C, 20 min Batch 36 °C Initial = 5.8, Operation = 5.8 ND 1.32 L H 2 /L POME 0.144 L H 2 / L h ND ND Rasdi et al ( 2012 ) POME anaerobic sludge HT, 90–95 °C, 30 min Serum bottles 37 °C Initial = 6.0, Operation = uncontrolled ND 27.09 mL H 2 /g COD 41.91 mL H 2 /L h Clostridium paraputrificum , Weissella soli , C. butyricum , C. hydrogeniformans , C. beijerinckii and Clostridium spp. PCR-DGGE Yossan et al ( 2012 ) POME anaerobic sludge HT, 90–95 °C, 30 min Serum bottles 55 °C Initial = 6.0, Operation = uncontrolled ND 26.63 mL H 2 /g COD 49.34 mL H 2 /L h C. paraputrificum , C. butyricum , Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum , C. baratii ...…”

Section: Microbiomes In Dark Fermentative Biohydrogen Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microbiomes of biohydrogen production from dark fermentation of industrial wastes: current trends, advanced tools and future outlook

Dzulkarnain

Audu

Dagang

et al. 2022

Bioresour. Bioprocess.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biohydrogen production through dark fermentation is very attractive as a solution to help mitigate the effects of climate change, via cleaner bioenergy production. Dark fermentation is a process where organic substrates are converted into bioenergy, driven by a complex community of microorganisms of different functional guilds. Understanding of the microbiomes underpinning the fermentation of organic matter and conversion to hydrogen, and the interactions among various distinct trophic groups during the process, is critical in order to assist in the process optimisations. Research in biohydrogen production via dark fermentation is currently advancing rapidly, and various microbiology and molecular biology tools have been used to investigate the microbiomes. We reviewed here the different systems used and the production capacity, together with the diversity of the microbiomes used in the dark fermentation of industrial wastes, with a special emphasis on palm oil mill effluent (POME). The current challenges associated with biohydrogen production were also included. Then, we summarised and discussed the different molecular biology tools employed to investigate the intricacy of the microbial ecology associated with biohydrogen production. Finally, we included a section on the future outlook of how microbiome-based technologies and knowledge can be used effectively in biohydrogen production systems, in order to maximise the production output.

show abstract

Kinetic analysis of biohydrogen production from anaerobically treated POME in bioreactor under optimized condition

Cited by 31 publications

References 16 publications

Comparison of ASBR and CSTR reactor for hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent under thermophilic condition

Comparison of ASBR and CSTR reactor for hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent under thermophilic condition

Kinetic Model of Thermophilic Biohydrogen Production from POME

Microbiomes of biohydrogen production from dark fermentation of industrial wastes: current trends, advanced tools and future outlook

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About