2006
DOI: 10.1144/0016-764904-129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematics of the Høybakken detachment zone and the Møre–Trøndelag Fault Complex, central Norway

Abstract: The tectonic disintegration of the Caledonian orogen through combined extension, contraction and strike-slip was characterized by spatial and temporal strain partitioning through a period of at least 30 Ma. Early to Mid-Devonian exhumation of the Central Norway basement window was associated with retrograde, top-to-the-SW extensional shearing in the Høybakken detachment zone, sinistral shearing along the Møre-Trøndelag Fault Complex, and formation of extension-parallel folds. Progressive exhumation led to incr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be argued that the Slørebotn detachment reactivated an existing structural grain in the basement, such as mylonites inherited from Devono‐Carboniferous postorogenic collapse. Indeed, the relationship between the Slørebotn detachment and strands of the MTFC resemble the relationship between the MTFC and the Devono‐Carboniferous Høybakken detachment ∼120 km to the northeast [ Osmundsen et al , 2006]. It is important to note, however, that the extension direction changed ∼90° from the Devonian to the Cretaceous, and that basin flank detachments such as the Bremstein Fault Complex clearly cuts the Paleozoic configuration of structures and basins [e.g., Osmundsen et al , 2002].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be argued that the Slørebotn detachment reactivated an existing structural grain in the basement, such as mylonites inherited from Devono‐Carboniferous postorogenic collapse. Indeed, the relationship between the Slørebotn detachment and strands of the MTFC resemble the relationship between the MTFC and the Devono‐Carboniferous Høybakken detachment ∼120 km to the northeast [ Osmundsen et al , 2006]. It is important to note, however, that the extension direction changed ∼90° from the Devonian to the Cretaceous, and that basin flank detachments such as the Bremstein Fault Complex clearly cuts the Paleozoic configuration of structures and basins [e.g., Osmundsen et al , 2002].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Mid‐Norwegian margin, this structural boundary is located onshore and corresponds to an array of (commonly reactivated) extensional shear zones and faults with normal and oblique displacements that roughly follow the line along which the crust becomes ~38–40 km thick (Mosar, ; Olesen et al, ; Redfield & Osmundsen, ). Extensional structures mapped between this area and the coast comprise mainly shear zones and faults related to Devonian “orogenic collapse” (e.g., Braathen et al, , ; Osmundsen et al, , ; Séranne, ), some with several up to tens of kilometers of displacement, that dissect and displace the Caledonian nappe pile and bound gneiss‐cored extensional culminations in their footwalls (Osmundsen et al, ). The brittle detachments in southwest Norway are associated with a regional, top to the west extensional shear zone up to several kilometers thick (Andersen & Jamtveit, ), and it has been suggested that they were connected with the Høybakken Detachment of Mid Norway along a NE‐SW trending shear zone segment that later became the locus of the Møre‐Trøndelag fault Complex (Osmundsen et al, ; Séranne, ) (Figure ).…”
Section: Domain‐bounding Breakaway Complexes and Associated Faults Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensional structures mapped between this area and the coast comprise mainly shear zones and faults related to Devonian “orogenic collapse” (e.g., Braathen et al, , ; Osmundsen et al, , ; Séranne, ), some with several up to tens of kilometers of displacement, that dissect and displace the Caledonian nappe pile and bound gneiss‐cored extensional culminations in their footwalls (Osmundsen et al, ). The brittle detachments in southwest Norway are associated with a regional, top to the west extensional shear zone up to several kilometers thick (Andersen & Jamtveit, ), and it has been suggested that they were connected with the Høybakken Detachment of Mid Norway along a NE‐SW trending shear zone segment that later became the locus of the Møre‐Trøndelag fault Complex (Osmundsen et al, ; Séranne, ) (Figure ). Extensional shear zones in Mid Norway north of the Høybakken Detachment appear to have accommodated less displacement than the latter and are separated by relay zones expressed as deflections in the Caledonian nappes (Osmundsen et al, , ).…”
Section: Domain‐bounding Breakaway Complexes and Associated Faults Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13B, C), during which deep, hot rocks were emplaced against the cooler Upper Allochthon. This episode continued into the period of orogen-parallel extension superimposed on that detachment (Terry & Robinson, 2003;Robinson et al, 2004Robinson et al, , 2014Osmundsen et al, 2006). The last part of this episode is confidently dated in the northern Western Gneiss Region at ~395 Ma, or late Emsian, in the Early Devonian Krogh et al, 2011).…”
Section: Regional Metamorphic Timingmentioning
confidence: 92%