Kinematic Analysis of 360° Turning in Stroke Survivors Using Wearable Motion Sensors

Abstract

Background: A stroke often bequeaths surviving patients with impaired neuromusculoskeletal systems subjecting them to increased risk of injury (e.g., due to falls) even during activities of daily living. The risk of injuries to such individuals can be related to alterations in their movement. Using inertial sensors to record the digital biomarkers during turning could reveal the relevant turning alterations. Objectives: In this study, movement alterations in stroke survivors (SS) were studied and compared to healthy individuals (HI) in the entire turning task due to its requirement of synergistic application of multiple bodily systems. Methods: The motion of 28 participants (14 SS, 14 HI) during turning was captured using a set of four Inertial Measurement Units, placed on their sternum, sacrum, and both shanks. The motion signals were segmented using the temporal and spatial segmentation of the data from the leading and trailing shanks. Several kinematic parameters, including the range of motion and angular velocity of the four body segments, turning time, the number of cycles involved in the turning task, and portion of the stance phase while turning, were extracted for each participant. Results: The results of temporal processing of the data and comparison between the SS and HI showed that SS had more cycles involved in turning, turn duration, stance phase, range of motion in flexion–extension, and lateral bending for sternum and sacrum (p-value < 0.035). However, HI exhibited larger angular velocity in flexion–extension for all four segments. The results of the spatial processing, in agreement with the prior method, showed no difference between the range of motion in flexion–extension of both shanks (p-value > 0.08). However, it revealed that the angular velocity of the shanks of leading and trailing legs in the direction of turn was more extensive in the HI (p-value < 0.01). Conclusions: The changes in upper/lower body segments of SS could be adequately identified and quantified by IMU sensors. The identified kinematic changes in SS, such as the lower flexion–extension angular velocity of the four body segments and larger lateral bending range of motion in sternum and sacrum compared to HI in turning, could be due to the lack of proper core stability and effect of turning on vestibular system of the participants. This research could facilitate the development of a targeted and efficient rehabilitation program focusing on the affected aspects of turning movement for the stroke community.

Validity of an android device for assessing mobility in people with chronic stroke and hemiparesis: a cross-sectional study

“…However, combining multiple data recording devices (e.g. having more than one IMU [ 99 , 100 ]) may improve the precision of the kinematic variables measured by a smartphone. Nonetheless, this approach could negatively impact the usability and speed of assessments, which are crucial in the clinical context.…”

Spanish consensus of occupational therapists on upper limb assessment tools in stroke

“…Motion analysis is included in the CAULIN recommendations to quantify the quality and execution of UL motion, although its clinical applicability is not yet well established (Prange-Lasonder et al, 2021). Recent technological advances have aided the design of more accessible and portable motion capture systems for out-of-laboratory assessment (Abdollahi et al, 2022). However, one of the current limitations is the lack of standardised assessment procedures (Schwarz et al, 2019).…”

Assessment of Passive Upper Limb Stiffness and Its Function in Post-Stroke Individuals Wearing an Inertial Sensor during the Pendulum Test

“…In this context, a prospective method could be found in the use of inertial measurement units combined with the pendulum test. The technology of inertial measurement units is accessible and portable, providing an increasingly popular assessment method outside laboratory contexts [ 12 ]. Inertial sensors, devices that use accelerometers and gyroscopes to measure changes in motion and orientation, play an important role in the objective assessment of muscle tone and its alterations, such as spasticity, yet there is currently a lack of studies that corroborate the clinical scales in use and the measures of the combined results [ 13 ].…”

“…Inertial sensors, devices that use accelerometers and gyroscopes to measure changes in motion and orientation, play an important role in the objective assessment of muscle tone and its alterations, such as spasticity, yet there is currently a lack of studies that corroborate the clinical scales in use and the measures of the combined results [ 13 ]. Inertial sensors are valuable, as they provide values for monitoring and evaluating individuals during neurorehabilitation, resulting in more objective data on physical progress and on how the upper limbs move in space [ 12 , 14 , 15 ]. Advanced linear and complex models have the capability to track varying trajectories over time, resulting in a diverse range of physiological outcomes [ 11 , 13 , 16 ].…”