2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0451-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinect-based assessment of proximal arm non-use after a stroke

Abstract: BackgroundAfter a stroke, during seated reaching with their paretic upper limb, many patients spontaneously replace the use of their arm by trunk compensation movements, even though they are able to use their arm when forced to do so. We previously quantified this proximal arm non-use (PANU) with a motion capture system (Zebris, CMS20s). The aim of this study was to validate a low-cost Microsoft Kinect-based system against the CMS20s reference system to diagnose PANU.MethodsIn 19 hemiparetic stroke individuals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
6
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Stroke survivors often compensate for the loss of motor function by adapting their movement patterns to incorporate additional degrees of freedom at other joints and body segments. During the seated reaching motion with their paretic upper limb, many patients spontaneously employed replace the use of their arm by recruiting excessive trunk or scapular movements, even though they are able to use their arm when forced to do so [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stroke survivors often compensate for the loss of motor function by adapting their movement patterns to incorporate additional degrees of freedom at other joints and body segments. During the seated reaching motion with their paretic upper limb, many patients spontaneously employed replace the use of their arm by recruiting excessive trunk or scapular movements, even though they are able to use their arm when forced to do so [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, we plan to extend our usability study in which we will acquire electromyogram signals from one's upper extremity during execution of such tasks. Thus, added to our preliminary calibration of one's individualized range of motion with the horizontal span of the HCI Task monitor, we plan to perform biomechanical evaluation of the patients similar to that in other studies (Kim et al, 2016; Bakhti et al, 2018; Scano et al, 2018) to tune individualized thresholds. Again, with regard to study settings, our present study offered a limited number of exposures to the post-stroke participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this pilot study showed that our device using Kinect v2 accurately measured ataxic movements employed in SARA ( Table 1) with high accuracy of better than 2 mm by simple comparison with a ruler. On the other hand, previous studies that validated accuracy of Kinect used other motion captures such as CMS20s (Zebris, Germany) for forelimb movement of stroke patients (19) or Optotrak Certus System (Northern Digital, Canada) for gait of healthy controls (21). However, they were not able to provide absolute accuracy in the measurement of Kinect.…”
Section: Reproducibility and Multiplicity In Digitalized Saramentioning
confidence: 99%