2013
DOI: 10.1080/17480272.2012.707686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kiln drying behavior of lumber from ten fast-growth plantation species in Costa Rica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to results reported by Moya and Muñoz (2008), Moya et al (2013) and Salas and Moya (2014) for G. melina lumber. This condition could be associated to the drying method (Klaiber and Seeling 2004), schedules (Salas and Moya, 2014), presence of juvenile wood (Zobel and Sprague 1998), growth stresses in the tree (Archer 1986) and anatomical variation (Moya and Muñoz 2008).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Contrary to results reported by Moya and Muñoz (2008), Moya et al (2013) and Salas and Moya (2014) for G. melina lumber. This condition could be associated to the drying method (Klaiber and Seeling 2004), schedules (Salas and Moya, 2014), presence of juvenile wood (Zobel and Sprague 1998), growth stresses in the tree (Archer 1986) and anatomical variation (Moya and Muñoz 2008).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The MC i obtained in this study varied from 53.1 to 183.5%, similar to values obtained for other species from forest plantations in Costa Rica. [14,17,26,27] However, in those specific studies, the studied plants showed coefficients of variation lower than 18%, in contrast to the coefficients of variation obtained in this study, most of which were greater than 20% ( Table 3). The high value found for the coefficient of variation of the studied species can be explained by the fact that the lumber samples were extracted from different parts of the tree.…”
Section: Moisture Contents and Drying Timesmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The average drying rate variation found (from 3.84 to 21.6%/day, Table 3) for the six species had lower values than those obtained for the 10 forest plantation species in Costa Rica. [14] The variation obtained in this parameter for the studied species as well as other species is attributed to the characteristics inherent to the wood, [6,7] the characteristics of the drying chamber, [8] and the conditions (temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed) used during drying. [6] It is important to clarify that although the drying rates were compared between species, this situation could vary because the drying rates are obviously different for each drying schedule used.…”
Section: Moisture Contents and Drying Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations