1981
DOI: 10.1038/293069a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Killing of Mycobacterium microti by immunologically activated macrophages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8 depicts a proposed model for the role of Nramp in macrophage defense against microbial invasion. Following the phagocytosis of a parasite into the phagosome, the macrophage produces reactive oxygen and/or nitrogen intermediates that are toxic for the internalized bacteria (43,44 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 depicts a proposed model for the role of Nramp in macrophage defense against microbial invasion. Following the phagocytosis of a parasite into the phagosome, the macrophage produces reactive oxygen and/or nitrogen intermediates that are toxic for the internalized bacteria (43,44 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most direct evidence implicating catalases as mycobacterial virulence factors is derived from studies demonstrating the protective effect of exogenous catalase. In these experiments, exogenous catalase protected against the killing of Mycobacterium microti by lymphokine-activated murine macrophages (18). More recent studies have shown, however, that the resistance of M. intracellulare strains to peroxide does not correlate with their catalase content and that the susceptibility of M. tuberculosis to killing by activated macrophages is not related to peroxide susceptibility (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The biological utility of this phenomenon is not clear. However, delayed basophil infiltrates are required for immune rejection of some large multicellular parasites, 2 whereas monocyte/macrophage-rich responses are more appropriate to immune resistance to facultative intracellular microorganisms, such as mycobacteria (1,25,26). Therefore, the ability of specific and nonspecific factors in immune serum to modulate the basophil vs. monocyte/macrophage component of T cell-dependent tissue responses might have important biological consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%