2016
DOI: 10.5505/kjms.2016.60490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kidney Ultrasound Elastography: Review

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(100 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Asano et al identified that the SWV decreased with eGFR decline (p < 0.01) [37]. The same results were obtained by other studies [10,13,14,38]. In HN patients, the reduction of SWV is consistent with the reduction of eGRF and renal histopathological changes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Asano et al identified that the SWV decreased with eGFR decline (p < 0.01) [37]. The same results were obtained by other studies [10,13,14,38]. In HN patients, the reduction of SWV is consistent with the reduction of eGRF and renal histopathological changes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Gray-scale ultrasonography reveals renal changes only in advanced stages of HN evolution. But early renal histopathological changes can be identified only by special ultrasonographic techniques, such as Doppler technique (as RRI of interlobar renal arteries), respectively ARFI (as SWV) [11][12][13][14][15]. RRI is increased in several renal parenchymal diseases, particularly those with pathological changes in tubules, renal interstitium and blood vessels, while patients with isolated glomerular lesions usually have normal RRI [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The stiffness of the hard lesions is higher, thus the displacement and deformation is lower in SE technique. So, the strain of hard lesions is lower, but the SI of hard lesions is higher, because of the ratio 21 . There was no significant change in SI values among RCC subtypes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%