2017
DOI: 10.1057/s41274-016-0174-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kidney exchange simulation and optimization

Abstract: One of the challenges in a kidney exchange program (KEP) is to choose policies that ensure an effective and fair management of all participating patients. In order to understand the implications of different policies of patient allocation and pool management, decision makers should be supported by a simulation tool capable of tackling realistic exchange pools and modeling their dynamic behavior. In this paper, we propose a KEP simulator that takes into consideration the wide typology of actors found in practic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Matching infrequently without reoptimizing while having high match failures is likely to lead to a very low match rate (as this delays discovering the actual compatibility graph). 47 Simulations that consider this tension can be found in Santos et al (2017) and Ashlagi et al (2018b). 48 Some studies consider the problem of maximizing the expected number of matches (Klimentova et al 2016, Wang et al 2017, Bidkhori et al 2020 or using robust optimization (McElfresh et al 2019).…”
Section: Frictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Matching infrequently without reoptimizing while having high match failures is likely to lead to a very low match rate (as this delays discovering the actual compatibility graph). 47 Simulations that consider this tension can be found in Santos et al (2017) and Ashlagi et al (2018b). 48 Some studies consider the problem of maximizing the expected number of matches (Klimentova et al 2016, Wang et al 2017, Bidkhori et al 2020 or using robust optimization (McElfresh et al 2019).…”
Section: Frictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See alsoCarvalho et al (2020) andBidkhori et al (2020).49 Indeed this is still poorly understood and just a few simulations of matching policies have been considered(Santos et al 2017, Ashlagi et al 2018). Ashlagi and Roth: Kidney Exchange: An Operations Perspective Management Science, Articles in Advance, pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation optimisation refers to solving an ILP model with stochastic elements (Karatas et al, 2017;Santos et al, 2017). In many cases simulation is used to estimate the objective function (Fu, 2015).…”
Section: Iterative Simulation Optimisation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conduct long-term simulations with agents arriving and leaving the pool such as in Santos et al (2017), (e.g. with 3-months matching runs for 3 years).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%