2018
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggy304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KG²B, a collaborative benchmarking exercise for estimating the permeability of the Grimsel granodiorite – Part 1: measurements, pressure dependence and pore-fluid effects

Abstract: • A benchmarking exercise involving 24 laboratories was organized to measure the permeability of the Grimsel granodiorite • The influence of pore fluid, sample size, pressure sensitivity and methods (steady-state, transient pulse, oscillation) are discussed • The average permeability measured with gas is larger than that measured with liquid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The operation of hydraulic fracture in the naturally fracture gas reservoirs has some complications due to the presence of natural fractures. Various complex fracturing models of naturally fractured formations have been developed to describe the complex interaction mechanism between NFs and HFs, such as the boundary element method (BEM) (Goodfellow et al 2015;David et al 2018), discrete element method (DEM) (Gehne and Benson 2017;Benson 2004) and the finite element method (FEM) based on the cohesive zone method (CZM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The operation of hydraulic fracture in the naturally fracture gas reservoirs has some complications due to the presence of natural fractures. Various complex fracturing models of naturally fractured formations have been developed to describe the complex interaction mechanism between NFs and HFs, such as the boundary element method (BEM) (Goodfellow et al 2015;David et al 2018), discrete element method (DEM) (Gehne and Benson 2017;Benson 2004) and the finite element method (FEM) based on the cohesive zone method (CZM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, the term "finite difference" is used as the synonym for the derivation of finite difference, especially in the field of numerical methods. The finite difference approximation, in fact, is the same outside of the differential divisions in the terminology used above (David et al 2018;Gehne and Benson 2017;Benson 2004).…”
Section: Finite Difference Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of the permeability of granitic rocks is usually accomplished by conducting either steady state or transient hydraulic pulse tests on cores of the rock. The literature on the topic is extensive and these include the seminal studies by Brace et al [87] and extensive references to further work in permeability estimation are given in [73,[75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][88][89][90][91][92][93]. The role of pore fluid migration in plutonic rocks, in particular during their creation, is discussed in [94].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies in this area are numerous and no attempt will be made to provide a comprehensive survey of past and recent developments. Advances in the area of poroelasticity and its applications to problems in geomechanics in particular are given by Yue and Selvadurai (1995), Selvadurai (1996), Selvadurai (2007), Wang (2000), Verruijt (2015), Cheng (2015), , Selvadurai and Suvorov (2016), and others. The basic development of the classical theory of poroelasticity relies on constitutive assumptions of Hookean elastic behaviour of the porous skeleton and Darcy flow through the porous medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If Biot's classi-P. Selvadurai et al: A multi-phasic approach for estimating the Biot coefficient cal theory of poroelasticity is accepted, values of α cannot be greater than unity. Such a value would imply that either K D < 0 or K S < 0, which would violate the positive definiteness arguments for the strain energy of an elastic porous skeleton (Davis and Selvadurai, 1996;Selvadurai, 2000) with no locked-in self equilibrating stresses (i.e. the skeleton expands under compressive isotropic stresses).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%