2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KFLC Index utility in multiple sclerosis diagnosis: Further confirmation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies indicate that high CSF concentrations of kappa FLCs seem to be a more sensitive marker of intrathecal IgG synthesis compared with the finding of CSF-restricted OCBs [5][6][7][8][9][10]15,[18][19][20], although recent studies point to a higher sensitivity of OCB detection [21] or to an equal performance of both tests [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various studies indicate that high CSF concentrations of kappa FLCs seem to be a more sensitive marker of intrathecal IgG synthesis compared with the finding of CSF-restricted OCBs [5][6][7][8][9][10]15,[18][19][20], although recent studies point to a higher sensitivity of OCB detection [21] or to an equal performance of both tests [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FLCs could therefore represent an additional marker of an ongoing oligoclonal humoral immune response within the CNS [4]. Several research groups have demonstrated increased kappa and, to a lesser extent, lambda FLC levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with MS [5][6][7][8][9][10]. In particular, FLCs were also detected in the CSF of the small proportion of patients diagnosed with MS without OCBs and in patients with CIS, suggesting that they may be a more sensitive marker of the disease [11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,14 The KFLC index has comparable sensitivity and specificity to OCB for diagnosis of MS and CIS. 14,21,23 However, large-scale studies comparing diagnostic performance of the two methods and to define the cut-off of FLC are lacking. The main aim of this study was to validate KFLC and LFLC indices as a diagnostic biomarker in MS compared with OCB in a large multicenter study including samples from 18 MS centers across Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that determination of CSF KFLC is a valuable quantitative alternative or complement to the qualitative assessment of OCB. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] But KFLC can be presented in many different ways, as the pure CSF concentration or in more complex metrics where the permeability of the blood-brain barrier and the different kinetics of the molecules passing that barrier is taken into account. There is currently no consensus as to which metric to be used in a clinical setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%