Key Success Factors in Introducing National e-Identification Systems

Tsap, Valentyna; Pappel, Ingrid; Draheim, Dirk

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70004-5_33

Cited by 21 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At a very formal level, we would say that a party is a legally trusted party, if it has been directly granted the status of an officially trusted party by respective legal regulations, or (indirectly) granted by a state authority in accordance with respective legal regulations. A standard example for such legally trusted parties are the certification authorities of national eID (electronic identification) solutions [30][31][32][33].…”

Section: Modes Of Business Communicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The majority of e-signature services worldwide [65] still use "flinstone" techniques for signing documents such as drawing a signature on the screen, or uploading a picture with signature. There are many barriers to implement contemporary eID and digital signature solutions in many countries in the world including EU in a secure, user-friendly, and scalable manner and -as a consequence -to have them adopted by the citizens [66, 33,67,31,68,69]. As indicated by several studies [70][71][72], eIDs and digital signatures are used mostly by major enterprises, whereas their usage by SMEs (small/medium enterprises) and ordinary citizens is marginal -due to the lack of a broad range of e-government services and a low usability of the systems.…”

Section: An Electronic Identity and Digital Signature Solutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Deep Analysis of Blockchain Technology from Socio-Economic and Technological Perspectives: Intrinsic Barriers and Potential Impact

Draheim¹

2023

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our aim is to understand technological and socio-economic barriers to blockchain solutions that are intrinsic in the blockchain technology stack itself (permissionless as well as permissioned). On the basis of that, we want to understand the future potentioal impact of blockchain technology. We provide an argumentation against the theoretical background of Williamson's instutional analysis framework, and triangulate the insights with results from four design science research efforts. We (i) characterize cryptocurrency as one-tiered collateralized money. We (ii) review potential blockchain solutions against defined essential modes of communications. We review (iii) well-known scalability issues and potential denial-of-service attacks through a new probabilistic model. We (iv) characterize a typical neglection of physical network infrastructure in blockchain technology discussions. We (v) describe four successful blockchain solutions and explain their design. There is (vi) no evidence that the proclaimed ``blockchain revolution'' can disrupt our institutional stack; instead, it can only happen in the boundaries of the current institutional stack. Nevertheless, it is possible to (vii) design useful blockchain solutions. The findings of this research enable policy makers, decision makers and information systems architects alike to make informed decisions about blockchain technology and its application. Given its theoretic foundation in new institutional economics, triangulated with comprehensive results from design science efforts, this study is the first of its kind in the area of blockchain technology research. <br>

show abstract

Section: Modes Of Business Communicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: An Electronic Identity and Digital Signature Solutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Deep Analysis of Blockchain Technology from Socio-Economic and Technological Perspectives: Intrinsic Barriers and Potential Impact

Draheim¹

2023

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This does not mean, that there is no centralization at all in X-Road. First, there is a state-managed central organization and the certification authority (CA) for establishing the PKI (public key infrastructure) [65,26]. Also, the information systems of members (that are accessed then via the e-services of the members) have to be published and confirmed by a registry maintained by the central authority, see the Estonian "X-Road regulation" [59].…”

Section: X-road Usage Patternsmentioning

confidence: 99%

On State-Level Architecture of Digital Government Ecosystems: From ICT-Driven to Data-Centric

Draheim

Krimmer

Tammet

2021

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The "digital transformation" is perceived as the key enabler for increasing wealth and well-being by politics, media and the citizens alike. In the same vein, digital government steadily receives more and more attention. Digital government gives rise to complex, large-scale state-level system landscapes consisting of many players and technological systems -and we call such system landscapes digital government ecosystems. In this paper, we systematically approach the state-level architecture of digital government ecosystems. We will discover the primacy of the state's institutional design in the architecture of digital government ecosystems, where Williamson's institutional analysis framework supports our considerations as theoretical background. Based on that insight, we will establish the notion of data governance architecture, which links data assets with accountable organizations. Our investigation results into a digital government architecture framework that can help in large-scale digital government design efforts through (i) separation of concerns in terms of appropriate categories, and (ii) a better assessment of the feasibility of envisioned digital transformations. With its focus on data, the proposed framework perfectly fits the current discussion on moving from ICT-driven to data-centric digital government.

show abstract

“…Citizens refrain from using e-portals unless the state has proven to treat their data in a rational, transparent and predictable manner. Skeptical attitude towards security of digital transactions and apprehension that electronically gathered data will be used for illicit purposes were named as prominent reasons for citizens' reluctance in adopting e-governing initiatives by number of published studies and articles [5], [8], [12].…”

Section: E-governance and Data Protectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Aspects of Personal Data Protection from State and Citizen Perspectives – Case of Georgia

Tsulukidze

Nyman-Metcalf²,

Tsap³

et al. 2019

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to investigate the process of personal data protection in Georgia within the frame of e-governance, focusing on available legal and technological protecting mechanisms, their practical usage and importance for realizing principles of good governance in the state. The scope of this research is defined by the protection of state databases containing citizen's personal data. Its key legal and technological aspects are identified and analyzed. The potential of proper data protection to act as the enabler of e-governance services success is also evaluated. We explore the defense mechanisms of Georgian governmental entities by conducting interviews with seven experts from the Personal Data Protection Inspectorate and other public entities handling citizens' data. We study citizens' perception of data safety and the citizens' knowledge of existing monitoring mechanisms through analysis of over 400 responses that we have received to our survey. We also analyze and assess the influence of these factors on the success of e-governance and its broad diffusion. Finally, guidelines and recommendations are formulated for raising citizens' awareness on the data protection mechanisms to be used in future theoretical and practical considerations.

show abstract

Key Success Factors in Introducing National e-Identification Systems

Cited by 21 publications

References 8 publications

A Deep Analysis of Blockchain Technology from Socio-Economic and Technological Perspectives: Intrinsic Barriers and Potential Impact

A Deep Analysis of Blockchain Technology from Socio-Economic and Technological Perspectives: Intrinsic Barriers and Potential Impact

On State-Level Architecture of Digital Government Ecosystems: From ICT-Driven to Data-Centric

Aspects of Personal Data Protection from State and Citizen Perspectives – Case of Georgia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About