2022
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2022.2032144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key parameters controlling surface quality and dimensional accuracy: a critical review of FFF process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous works in the literature [ 73 ] inspired the analysis of experimental data. The three best values reported of the six experiments conducted were considered in the modeling process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works in the literature [ 73 ] inspired the analysis of experimental data. The three best values reported of the six experiments conducted were considered in the modeling process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEX 3D printing is well known for its flexibility to control several building parameters, such as layer height, strands' width, infill density, raster pattern, etc., which all imply high inhomogeneity and anisotropy to the outcome, in a stochastic manner. On the other hand, the porosity (even for 100% infill density), the surface roughness, and the dimensional inaccuracy are unavoidable, especially when compared with other fabrication processes [28]. Therefore, the adoption of the aforementioned analytical and/or numerical thermo-mechanical models will not produce reliable or somehow acceptable results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical modeling tools have been introduced for the analysis and optimization of material extrusion (MEX) 3D printing parameters for materials, such as Polyamides [26] and Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) [27]. Additionally, such modeling tools have been used for the optimization of the surface quality of 3D printed parts of different materials [28], and in hybrid additive manufacturing (HAM), for laser cutting of polymers 3D printed with MEX, such as polylactic acid (PLA) [29], and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) [30]. These modeling tools revealed the critical parameters in each case, leading to useful conclusions for the improvement of the results of these processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the anisotropy and mechanical shortage handicap extensive engineering applications, especially in structures enduring the key loads. Moreover, higher printing temperatures, suitable printing speed, and thinner printing thickness are important factors for the quality performance of the 3D printed models in this paper [ 39 , 40 ]. The bionic helicoidal structures might provide the potential solution to enhance the FFF product load-carrying capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%