2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key Odorants Regulate Food Attraction in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: In insects, the search for food is highly dependent on olfactory sensory input. Here, we investigated whether a single key odorant within an odor blend or the complexity of the odor blend influences the attraction of Drosophila melanogaster to a food source. A key odorant is defined as an odorant that elicits a difference in the behavioral response when two similar complex odor blends are offered. To validate that the observed behavioral responses were elicited by olfactory stimuli, we used olfactory co-recept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This unexpected repellency from compounds isolated from the headspace of an attractive bait may be explained by differences in the chemical concentration of 2‐pentylfuran emitted from bread dough compared to the pure compound released from vials during the subsequent behavioral assay. Similar concentration‐dependent antagonistic and agonistic responses to semiochemicals are well known in insects and reflect the need for detailed behavioral assessments at a range of concentrations and release rates in order to establish the unique chemical ecology of species 45,46 . Indeed, in our dose–response tests, 2‐pentylfuran did not show repellent activities under 0.6 mg h −1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This unexpected repellency from compounds isolated from the headspace of an attractive bait may be explained by differences in the chemical concentration of 2‐pentylfuran emitted from bread dough compared to the pure compound released from vials during the subsequent behavioral assay. Similar concentration‐dependent antagonistic and agonistic responses to semiochemicals are well known in insects and reflect the need for detailed behavioral assessments at a range of concentrations and release rates in order to establish the unique chemical ecology of species 45,46 . Indeed, in our dose–response tests, 2‐pentylfuran did not show repellent activities under 0.6 mg h −1 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In order to examine how flies interact with sources of alcohol, we conducted behavioral studies of attraction (Figure 1a,b,c). As shown previously 4,5,7,8 , male flies were acutely attracted to sources of ethanol. Furthermore, we confirmed that mating status created variability in this attractive behavior 5 , namely that virgin males were more attracted to sources of ethanol than recently mated males (Figure 1b).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…In a binary choice assay, flies choose between two equal food odor traps (Ogueta et al, 2010 ). The presence of an attractive key odorant within the food odor biases the decision to move towards and enter the food odor trap containing the key odorant (Giang et al, 2017 ). The attraction for one odor trap in comparison to an equal second food odor trap can also be induced by activation of tyraminergic/octopaminergic neurons using the UAS -ChR2 transgene under the control of the dTdc2-Gal4 driver (Schneider et al, 2012 ; Figure 1A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the choice between two similar attractive food odor sources, male and female Drosophila are more attracted to ethanol-enriched food odors than to a similar odor without ethanol (Ogueta et al, 2010 ). The low ethanol concentration that elicits approach functions as a key odorant in the food odor mixture (Giang et al, 2017 ). The approach depends on the positive reinforcing action of the octopaminergic/tyraminergic neurotransmitter system, as neuronal activation of neurons expressing tyrosine decarboxylase 2 (dTdc2)—the enzyme required for tyramine and indirectly for octopamine synthesis (Cole et al, 2005 )—results in attraction (Schneider et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%