2003
DOI: 10.1071/ea02086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key features of the regional producer network for enabling social learning

Abstract: This paper outlines a form of research and extension that involves producers, researchers, program administrators, facilitators and others with an interest in on-farm, natural resource management and production improvement. Drawing predominantly from a review of the Sustainable Grazing Systems (SGS) regional producer network involving 88 interviews with producers, managers and scientists and in-depth studies of 4 SGS regional producer committees, findings advocate the establishment of arrangements where produc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leeuwis and Pyburn (2002) conducted comprehensive studies on the social learning network in agriculture. Sociological approaches were used mainly in social learning in agriculture as follows: technological innovation in genetically modified crops (Oreszczyn et al, 2010); farmers' markets (Hinrichs et al, 2004); organic farmers' networks (Kroma, 2006); and sustainable or environmentally friendly agriculture (Naiper and Tucker 2001;Andrew, 2003;Nerbonne and Lentz, 2003;Ingram, 2010). With social learning in environmental research, issues on environmental education and raising awareness of the environment have been studied (Measham, 2006;Raymond et al, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leeuwis and Pyburn (2002) conducted comprehensive studies on the social learning network in agriculture. Sociological approaches were used mainly in social learning in agriculture as follows: technological innovation in genetically modified crops (Oreszczyn et al, 2010); farmers' markets (Hinrichs et al, 2004); organic farmers' networks (Kroma, 2006); and sustainable or environmentally friendly agriculture (Naiper and Tucker 2001;Andrew, 2003;Nerbonne and Lentz, 2003;Ingram, 2010). With social learning in environmental research, issues on environmental education and raising awareness of the environment have been studied (Measham, 2006;Raymond et al, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Morgan and Murdoch, 2000: 161). The primary actors in these horizontal learning networks are farmers, who share their experiences with particular production techniques (Hassanein and Kloppenburg, 1995;Hassanein, 1999;Andrew, 2003). Agency therefore is not determined by the position of actors in social or political environments, rather it is an outcome of their relationships with others, (including non-human others), and as such is a ''relational achievement'' (Whatmore, 1998: 26).…”
Section: Agency and Social Network In Agricultural Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two notable conclusions from the recent national Sustainable Grazing Systems (SGS) research and adoption program across southern Australia were that producers need to be 'in control of research and development to maximise learning and on-ground change' (Andrew 2003) and that they benefited from interactions with others especially in a 'non-threatening environment'. The SGS Project reported that producer participation before, during and after the project was recognised as vital to achieving practice change and the project reinforced an increasing interest in producer involvement in research and adoption relating to grazing enterprises (Simpson et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%