2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.724-725.268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key Factors of Thermal Efficiency Test Protocols for Household Biomass Cookstoves

Abstract: In this paper, three typical test methods for thermal efficiency of biomass stoves were discussed. The effect factors such as operation process, test ending time, pot sizes, amount of water on the thermal efficiency of domestic biomass cookstoves were studied. The results show that the test ending time and the amount of water used have major impacts on thermal efficiency. The amount of water is in positive correlation with the thermal efficiency of the stove (R=0.92) when the heat needed for the selected amoun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chamber heights and ventilation rates were not requested by the listed test methods, but also had a significant influence on performance [20]. The test ending point operations were the most dissimilar, but little had been reported about this in the literature [11,12]. Combined with the actual stove design, a four-factor, three-level orthogonal test was designed to evaluate the stove performance under a range of conditions (see Table 2).…”
Section: Testing Conditions Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chamber heights and ventilation rates were not requested by the listed test methods, but also had a significant influence on performance [20]. The test ending point operations were the most dissimilar, but little had been reported about this in the literature [11,12]. Combined with the actual stove design, a four-factor, three-level orthogonal test was designed to evaluate the stove performance under a range of conditions (see Table 2).…”
Section: Testing Conditions Set Upmentioning
confidence: 99%