2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key considerations on the development of biodegradable biomaterials for clinical translation of medical devices: With cartilage repair products as an example

Abstract: With the interdisciplinary convergence of biology, medicine and materials science, both research and clinical translation of biomaterials are progressing at a rapid pace. However, there is still a huge gap between applied basic research on biomaterials and their translational products - medical devices, where two significantly different perspectives and mindsets often work independently and non-synergistically, which in turn significantly increases financial costs and research effort. Although this gap is well… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last few decades, researchers and scientists have attempted to fulfil the demands [1] of osteoarthritic patients [2,3] with an articular cartilage scaffold [4,5] equipped with requisite strength [6,7], cell growth factors [8][9][10], and anti-inflammatory properties [11,12]. Unfortunately, they invented biomaterials, such as hydrogels and their derivatives, that were equipped with the carriers of cell growth factors [13] and anti-inflammatory properties [14] but without the requisite strengths [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last few decades, researchers and scientists have attempted to fulfil the demands [1] of osteoarthritic patients [2,3] with an articular cartilage scaffold [4,5] equipped with requisite strength [6,7], cell growth factors [8][9][10], and anti-inflammatory properties [11,12]. Unfortunately, they invented biomaterials, such as hydrogels and their derivatives, that were equipped with the carriers of cell growth factors [13] and anti-inflammatory properties [14] but without the requisite strengths [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All medical devices must fulfill clinical needs and solve practical problems [ [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] ]. The academic value of research findings is not always aligned with their clinical values.…”
Section: A Regulatory Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The academic value of research findings is not always aligned with their clinical values. However, if an innovation is expected to bring new technologies and products to the market, then research on market and clinical demands should be conducted as early as possible [ [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] ]. The urgent clinical needs and unsolved problems should be pinpointed to refine the research program accordingly.…”
Section: A Regulatory Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 24 articles [ [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , [27] ] are included in this special issue. These articles can be categorized in terms of authors, biomaterials and targeted clinical areas, and article types.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several articles in this special issue are on regulatory science and discuss the new standards, tools, and approaches to evaluate the safety, efficacy, quality, and performance of medical products [ 10 , 13 , 17 , 19 ]. This special issue also covers a wide range of article types including research article [ [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , 11 , 12 , 15 , 16 , [18] , [19] , [20] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] ], reviews [ 14 , 17 , 21 , 22 , 27 ], perspectives [ 10 , 13 ] and opinion paper [ 18 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%