2011
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/48/1a/06010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K2 of the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in low-energy x-rays

Abstract: A key comparison has been made between the air-kerma standards of the ENEA-INMRI, Italy and the BIPM in the low-energy x-ray range. The results show the standards to be in agreement at the level of the standard uncertainty for the comparison of 1.9 parts in 103. No significant trend with radiation quality is observed. The results are analysed and presented in terms of degrees of equivalence, suitable for entry in the BIPM key comparison database.Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ionization chambers were calibrated with respect to the air kerma primary standard chamber for low-energy x-rays by the Department of Ionizing Radiation Metrology of the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment (ENEA). 19 The whole equipment was designed to guarantee the safety of patients and operators and was strictly checked. 20…”
Section: Mammographic Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionization chambers were calibrated with respect to the air kerma primary standard chamber for low-energy x-rays by the Department of Ionizing Radiation Metrology of the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment (ENEA). 19 The whole equipment was designed to guarantee the safety of patients and operators and was strictly checked. 20…”
Section: Mammographic Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ENEA-INMRI participated in 2011 in the BIPM.RI(I)-K2 comparison using the primary standards, being the same standards used for the mammography beams for both the ENEA-INMRI and the BIPM (Burns et al 2011). The direct comparison result for the quality 25 kV, W/Al beam, the closest in HVL to the mammography W/Mo beams, was 0.9976 (28); this result is in agreement, within the uncertainties, with the results presented in Table 9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The BIPM air-kerma standard is described by Boutillon et al (1969); the correction factors for the mammography qualities are described by Kessler (2006) and the changes made to certain correction factors, by Burns et al (2009). A description of the ENEA-INMRI CAL02 standard can be found in the report of the direct comparison carried out at the BIPM in the W/Al low-energy x-ray beams (Burns et al 2011). The main dimensions, the measuring volume and the polarizing voltage for each standard are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Details Of the Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A custom dosimetric system, based on two custom-made high-precision ionization chambers placed approximately 3 m upstream from the sample, was used to define the exposure parameters. The ionization chambers measure the entrance radiation dose in terms of absolute air kerma and were calibrated by the Department of Ionizing Radiation Metrology of the Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Environment (ENEA) 40,41 . This system is used to calculate the MGD delivered to the sample throughout the tomographic acquisition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%