2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2011.03.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ketiminate supported aluminum(III) complexes: Synthesis, characterization and reactivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The side‐arm donor group (NMe 2 ) coordinates in all complexes to the Lewis‐acidic aluminum atom, resulting in the formation of five‐membered AlN 2 C 2 rings, and the Al–N bond lengths [2.2283(8) Å 7 , 2.1468(12) Å 12 , 2.0921(6) Å 13 , 2.1441(9) Å 14 ] are comparable to those reported for L1 Do2 Al(Me)Cl [2.252(2) Å] and L1 Do2 AlCl 2 [2.171(3) Å] . The axial Al–N2 bond lengths are significantly elongated compared to the equatorial Al–N1 bond lengths.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The side‐arm donor group (NMe 2 ) coordinates in all complexes to the Lewis‐acidic aluminum atom, resulting in the formation of five‐membered AlN 2 C 2 rings, and the Al–N bond lengths [2.2283(8) Å 7 , 2.1468(12) Å 12 , 2.0921(6) Å 13 , 2.1441(9) Å 14 ] are comparable to those reported for L1 Do2 Al(Me)Cl [2.252(2) Å] and L1 Do2 AlCl 2 [2.171(3) Å] . The axial Al–N2 bond lengths are significantly elongated compared to the equatorial Al–N1 bond lengths.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…L1 Do1 AlMe 2 7 is a new polymorph of the known structure of L1 Do1 AlMe 2 and the bonding parameters (Al–O, Al–N, and Al–C bond length, endo ‐ and exo ‐cyclic bond angles) of both polymorphs are almost identical. In addition, the solid‐state structures of L1 Do1 Al(Cl)Me ( 12 ) and L1 Do1 AlCl 2 ( 13 ) are comparable to those of L1 Do2 Al(Me)Cl and L1 Do2 AlCl 2 , respectively, and their central Al–N [ 7 1.9857(7) Å; 12 1.9658(11) Å; 13 1.9414(6) Å; 14 1.9719(8) Å] and Al–O [ 7 1.8984(7) Å; 12 1.8541(11) Å; 13 1.8232(6) Å; 14 1.8656(7) Å] bond lengths and O–Al–N bond angles [ 7 88.65(3)°; 12 89.92(5)°; 13 91.15(3)°; 14 89.23(3)°] within the six‐membered AlONC 3 metallacycle also agree very well. The Al atoms in the complexes are fivefold coordinated and show distorted trigonal‐bipyramidal (tbp) coordination modes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1 This allows the precursor to be tailored to the specific CVD application. Metal b-ketoiminate precursors ranging from zinc, 27 group 13 [27][28][29][30] and, albeit unstable, group II metals 31 have been reported. A number of different R groups attached to the N donor atom have been explored and are mostly alkyl groups that increase the steric demand of the ligand, and donor functionalised groups, such as a polyether, which yield multidentate ligands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please do not adjust margins All Al-heteroatom bonds in 1-Al were found to be significantly shorter than the 5-coordinate complexes reported by Richards and Shulz previously, 40,41 which is likely a consequence of the comparatively electron deficient nature of the aluminum center in 1-Al. Complexes 2-Al and 3-Al both displayed a distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometry with a  4 value of 0.87 for 2-Al and 0.76 for 3-Al, suggesting that the Dip-substituted amidoeanote ligands in 3-Al distort the geometry of the aluminium center significantly more than the iPr-substituents in 2-Al.…”
Section: Please Do Not Adjust Marginsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Complex 1-Al represents the first example of a tetrahedral aluminium dichloride unit featuring a ligand that binds through both oxygen and nitrogen and was synthesised from the salt metathesis reaction of [Li(AME iPr )] and AlCl 3 (Scheme 1). Two previous examples of aluminium dichlorides featuring (O,N)-binding ligands have been reported by Richards 40 and Shulz, 41 with the formulae [AlCl 2 {(RNC(Me)CHC(Me)O}], R = Fig. 2 Previously reported zinc bis-amidoenoates (A and B), ethyl zinc amidoenoate dimers (C and D) and tungsten amidoenoate complexes (E and F).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%