2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2007.10.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kera tone and voicing interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior on the part of the females resembles that observed in at least one other situation. Kera, a Chadic language spoken in Chad and Cameroon, is a language that has recently undergone a tonogenesis-like change, as reported in Pearce (2009). The “voicing” contrast is now signaled primarily by F0 and secondarily by VOT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This behavior on the part of the females resembles that observed in at least one other situation. Kera, a Chadic language spoken in Chad and Cameroon, is a language that has recently undergone a tonogenesis-like change, as reported in Pearce (2009). The “voicing” contrast is now signaled primarily by F0 and secondarily by VOT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…as MSCs (MacEachern 1997), as we saw in (2) for Chaha. Only a handful of languages are known to exhibit morphologically conditioned alternations in laryngeal features, and at least some of them have been reanalysed as involving tone rather than voicing (see Hansson 2004 on Yabem and Pearce 2005 on Kera). One unambiguous case of laryngeal alternations occurs in the Berber language Tamajaq Tuareg, where the voiceless sibilant fricative /s/ of the prefix becomes voiced if there is a voiced sibilant anywhere in the root, as in /s-əntəz/ → [z-əntəz] ‘cause to extract’ and, combined with sibilant harmony, /s-kuʒət/ → [ʒ-əkːuʒət] ‘cause to saw’ (Alojaly 1980, Hansson 2010: 114).…”
Section: Typology Of Laryngeal Consonant Harmonymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The persistent use of voiced/ voiceless in two different senses, phonological and phonetic, leads to constant confusion and misinterpretation of data. A recent example of this is the work on tone and voicing in Kera [Pearce, 2009], a UCL PhD thesis [Pearce, 2007], which L. comments on quite extensively. Westerners developed a script for Kera which distinguishes b/p, d/t and g/k as categorized by Western ears.…”
Section: ]mentioning
confidence: 99%