Keeping party programmes on track: the transmission of the policy agendas of executive speeches to legislative outputs in the United Kingdom

Abstract

In the United Kingdom, the transmission between policy promises and statutes is assumed to be both rapid and efficient because of the tradition of party discipline, relative stability of government, absence of coalitions, and the limited powers of legislative revision in the second chamber. Even in the United Kingdom, the transmission is not perfect since legislative priorities and outputs are susceptible to changes in public opinion or media coverage, unanticipated events in the external world, backbench rebellions, changes in the political parties, and the practical constraints of administering policies or programmes. This paper investigates the strength of the connection between executive priorities and legislative outputs measured by the Speech from the Throne and Acts of Parliament from 1911 to 2008. These are categorized according to the policy content coding system of the UK Policy Agendas Project (www.policyagendas.org.uk). Time series cross-sectional analyses show that there is transmission of the policy agenda from the speech to acts. However, the relationship differs by party, strengthening over time for Conservative governments and declining over time for Labour and other governments.

Domestic Politics and Changes in Foreign Aid Allocation: The Role of Party Preferences

“…Studies often find weak evidence of partisan priorities affecting policy change (e.g. Bevan, John and Jennings 2011). Our findings, however, suggest parties pursue their stated goals.…”

“…Even in the context of coalition or divided government, parties fulfill many electoral pledges (Thomson 2001(Thomson , 2011, and pursue policies and budgets consistent with their goals (Alesina andRosenthal 1995, Schmidt 1996 (Bevan andGreene 2016, 2017).…”

Parties' Influence during Government Policy Negotiations: Parliamentary Dynamics and Spatial Advantages in the First Italian Republic

“…McDonald & Budge, (2005, p. 141) stress that government policy declarations 'have the advantage of outlining a 440 THE JOURNAL OF LEGISLATIVE STUDIES whole range of plans, for legislation and administration as well as spending'. Moreover, recent works (see, for example, Bevan, John, & Jennings, 2011) show a significant and relevant transmission of the policy agenda from government speeches to legislative outputs. A possible drawback in using the coding of legislative speeches as a measure of parties' policy influence is that this procedure may generate biased results whenever the linkage between government and parliamentary majority influences what parties say during a vote of investiture.…”

Responsive elections: The effect of public opinion on political campaigns

“…Bara 2005) as is any form of agenda implementation (e.g. Bevan et al 2011;Lovett et al 2015) these mechanisms play a central role in our understanding of politics.…”