Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) 2020
DOI: 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Keep it Surprisingly Simple: A Simple First Order Graph Based Parsing Model for Joint Morphosyntactic Parsing in Sanskrit

Abstract: Morphologically rich languages seem to benefit from joint processing of morphology and syntax, as compared to pipeline architectures. We propose a graph-based model for joint morphological parsing and dependency parsing in Sanskrit. Here, we extend the Energy based model framework (Krishna et al., 2020), proposed for several structured prediction tasks in Sanskrit, in 2 simple yet significant ways. First, the framework's default input graph generation method is modified to generate a multigraph, which enables … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ Results: Clearly, the proposed ensembled system outperforms the state of the art purely data-driven system (BiAFF) by 2.8/3.9 points (UAS/LAS) absolute gain. 7 Interestingly, it also supersedes the performance of the hybrid state of the art system [Krishna et al 2020b, MG-EBM] by 1.2 points (UAS) absolute gain and shows comparable performance for LAS metric. We observe that performance of transition-based systems (YAP/L2S) is significantly low compared to graph-based counterparts (BiAFF/Ours).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ Results: Clearly, the proposed ensembled system outperforms the state of the art purely data-driven system (BiAFF) by 2.8/3.9 points (UAS/LAS) absolute gain. 7 Interestingly, it also supersedes the performance of the hybrid state of the art system [Krishna et al 2020b, MG-EBM] by 1.2 points (UAS) absolute gain and shows comparable performance for LAS metric. We observe that performance of transition-based systems (YAP/L2S) is significantly low compared to graph-based counterparts (BiAFF/Ours).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[BiAFF] is a graph-based approach with BiAFFINE attention mechanism. Krishna et al [2020b][MG-EBM] extends Krishna et al [2020c][Tree-EBM-F] using multi-graph formulation. We report their standalone numbers for fair comparison.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the largest freely available repository of translations are for The Bhagavadgita (Prabhakar et al, 2000) and The Rāmāyana (Geervani et al, 1989). However, labeled datasets for other tasks, like the ones proposed in (Kulkarni, 2013;Bhardwaj et al, 2018; have resulted in parsers (Krishna et al, 2020(Krishna et al, , 2021 and sandhi splitters (Aralikatte et al, 2018; which are pre-cursors to modular translation systems. Though there have been attempts at building Sanskrit translation tools (Bharati and Kulkarni, 2009), they are mostly rule-based and rely on manual intervention.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the largest freely available repository of translations are for The Bhagavadgita (Prabhakar et al, 2000) and The Rāmāyana (Geervani et al, 1989). However, labeled datasets for other tasks, like the ones proposed in (Kulkarni, 2013;Bhardwaj et al, 2018; have resulted in parsers (Krishna et al, 2020(Krishna et al, , 2021 and sandhi splitters (Aralikatte et al, 2018; which are pre-cursors to modular translation systems. Though there have been attempts at building Sanskrit translation tools (Bharati and Kulkarni, 2009), they are mostly rule-based and rely on manual intervention.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%