2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-706x(01)00186-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

kDNA markers define two major Trypanosoma rangeli lineages in Latin-America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
19

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
47
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has revealed two phylogenetically different groups in T. rangeli called T. rangeli KP1(-) and T. rangeli KP1(+), these being mainly transmitted by the 16 Rhodnius species described so far (Vallejo et al 2002(Vallejo et al , 2007. Specificity between the vector and the parasite strain which it transmits has been pointed out; each Rhodnius species seems to select the T. rangeli subpopulation to which it is susceptible in nature so that it can then be transmitted to the vertebrate host via insect bite .…”
Section: Ph the Protein Was Partially Purified By Gel Filtration Chrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous work has revealed two phylogenetically different groups in T. rangeli called T. rangeli KP1(-) and T. rangeli KP1(+), these being mainly transmitted by the 16 Rhodnius species described so far (Vallejo et al 2002(Vallejo et al , 2007. Specificity between the vector and the parasite strain which it transmits has been pointed out; each Rhodnius species seems to select the T. rangeli subpopulation to which it is susceptible in nature so that it can then be transmitted to the vertebrate host via insect bite .…”
Section: Ph the Protein Was Partially Purified By Gel Filtration Chrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parasite develops in the digestive tract and then invades the hemolymph where it is recognized by the vector's immune system; however, some strains may escape host defense mechanisms, reaching the salivary glands where they become infective forms or metacyclic trypomastigotes (D'Alessandro-Bacigalupo & Gore-Saravia 1992). Salivary gland invasion is a necessary step for transmission, being mediated by one or several ligandreceptor interactions (Basseri et al 2002).Previous work has revealed two phylogenetically different groups in T. rangeli called T. rangeli KP1(-) and T. rangeli KP1(+), these being mainly transmitted by the 16 Rhodnius species described so far (Vallejo et al 2002(Vallejo et al , 2007. Specificity between the vector and the parasite strain which it transmits has been pointed out; each Rhodnius species seems to select the T. rangeli subpopulation to which it is susceptible in nature so that it can then be transmitted to the vertebrate host via insect bite .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vallejo, et al (10), characterized two major lineages of T. rangeli in Latin America based on the presence or absence of a minicircle of kDNA (KP1+ and KP1-, respectively). T. rangeli presents an extensive genetic variability demonstrated by kDNA and nuclear DNA analysis (7,9,11,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These strains were provided by Laboratorio de Parasitología, Instituto Nacional de Salud, (INS) (Bogotá, Colombia). Both parasites species were characterized by isoenzymes 24 and PCR using miniexon and minicircle sequences as targets 5,31,33 . The bulk parasite mass was cultivated in REI modified liquid medium, supplemented with 2% FCS and 100 µg/mL of gentamicin, and incubated at 24 °C.…”
Section: Parasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colombia is one of the countries in which T. cruzi shares vectors and reservoirs with T. rangeli 7,13,14 . Recently, two important epidemiological groups of T. rangeli have been described: KP1(-) strains, associated with the adaptive line of Rhodnius, represented by R. colombiensis, R. pallescens, and R. ecuadoriensis, and KP1(+) strains, associated with R. prolixus [30][31][32] . These two groups have been defined on the basis of independent mitochondrial (minicircle profile dimorphism obtained by kDNA PCR amplification) and nuclear (mini-exon PCR amplification) markers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%