2006
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01083.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KCNQ/Kv7 Channel Regulation of Hippocampal Gamma-Frequency Firing in the Absence of Synaptic Transmission

Abstract: Piccinin, S., A. D. Randall, and J. T. Brown. KCNQ/Kv7 channel regulation of hippocampal gamma-frequency firing in the absence of synaptic transmission. J Neurophysiol 95: 3105-3112, 2006. First published February 8, 2006 doi:10.1152/jn.01083.2005. Synchronous neuronal firing can be induced in hippocampal slices in the absence of synaptic transmission by lowering extracellular Ca 2ϩ and raising extracellular K ϩ . However, the ionic mechanisms underlying this nonsynaptic synchronous firing are not well unders… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, retigabine completely suppressed these long-lasting events whenever present. The fact that retigabine failed to fully suppress all types of CCh-induced events is in apparent contrast with the ability of this drug to abolish both ictal-and interictallike events induced in vitro by 4-aminopyridine (Armand et al, 1999), or by perfusion with low Mg 2+ - (Qiu et al, 2007) or low Ca 2+ /high K + - (Piccinin et al, 2006) containing medium. It should be, however, mentioned that distinct levels of K M activity could be recruited by different epileptogenic stimuli; in particular, in the present model of ictogenesis triggered by muscarinic stimulation, K M contribution would be less pronounced since CCh induces a profound depletion in plasma membrane PIP2, thus leading to a substantial suppression of K M .…”
Section: Involvement Of K M In the Modulation Of Cch-induced Synchronmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, retigabine completely suppressed these long-lasting events whenever present. The fact that retigabine failed to fully suppress all types of CCh-induced events is in apparent contrast with the ability of this drug to abolish both ictal-and interictallike events induced in vitro by 4-aminopyridine (Armand et al, 1999), or by perfusion with low Mg 2+ - (Qiu et al, 2007) or low Ca 2+ /high K + - (Piccinin et al, 2006) containing medium. It should be, however, mentioned that distinct levels of K M activity could be recruited by different epileptogenic stimuli; in particular, in the present model of ictogenesis triggered by muscarinic stimulation, K M contribution would be less pronounced since CCh induces a profound depletion in plasma membrane PIP2, thus leading to a substantial suppression of K M .…”
Section: Involvement Of K M In the Modulation Of Cch-induced Synchronmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This greatly increases open channel probability at resting membrane potentials (Tatulian & Brown, 2003). In the hippocampus, retigabine inhibits action potential generation (Piccinin et al 2006; Hu et al 2007). Conversely, inhibition of Kv7 channel function by application of the Kv7 channel blockers XE991 or linopirdine produces hyperexcitability and triggers burst firing in various hippocampal neurons (Yue & Yaari, 2004; Lawrence et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except KCNQ1, all KCNQ subunits are expressed in the brain controlling axonal excitability, synaptic transmission, spike afterpotentials, spike frequency adaptation, and theta resonance, leading to neuronal hyperpolarization and stabilizing the membrane potential (Hu et al 2007;Jentsch et al 2000;Vervaeke et al 2006). KCNQ channels regulate nonsynaptic bursting activity, block synaptic transmission, increase neuronal firing, and control synchronous population firing activity in the brain (Piccinin et al 2006). Mutations of KCNQ channels have been linked to several brain disorders accompanied with increased neuronal excitability, such as epilepsy, anxiety, and migraine (Korsgaard et al 2005;Lerche et al 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%