2019
DOI: 10.1556/034.61.2019.1-2.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotypic studies of four Physalis species from Nigeria

Abstract: Mitotic chromosomes from root tips of four Nigerian Physalis species were investigated using standard cytogenetic methods. P. angulata has chromosome number of 2n = 48 with karyotypic formula of 2M + 5m + 16sm + 1st, while P. micrantha, P. peruviana and P. pubescens showed the same chromosome number of 2n = 24 with karyotypic formulae of 1M + 1m + 9sm + 1st, 4M + 6m + 1sm + 1st and 1M + 1 m + 2sm + 8st, respectively. The karyotypes show that P. angulata is more advanced when compared to the other three diploid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most cytogenetic studies in Physalis peruviana L. have used classical staining techniques to determine the chromosome number, where 2n=48 predominates (Rodríguez and Bueno 2006;Sánchez 2014;Liberato et al 2014;Trevisani et al 2018), while other studies report mixoploid plants (Sánchez 2014), and somatic aneuploidy (Carbajal et al 2021). Karyotypic formulas of some populations have been previously reported (Azeez and Faluyi 2019;Carbajal et al 2021). However, since goldenberry chromosomes are small, numerous, and have similar morphology, the karyotype determination and its analysis are considered limited when classical staining techniques are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most cytogenetic studies in Physalis peruviana L. have used classical staining techniques to determine the chromosome number, where 2n=48 predominates (Rodríguez and Bueno 2006;Sánchez 2014;Liberato et al 2014;Trevisani et al 2018), while other studies report mixoploid plants (Sánchez 2014), and somatic aneuploidy (Carbajal et al 2021). Karyotypic formulas of some populations have been previously reported (Azeez and Faluyi 2019;Carbajal et al 2021). However, since goldenberry chromosomes are small, numerous, and have similar morphology, the karyotype determination and its analysis are considered limited when classical staining techniques are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%