1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf00293910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyotypes and meiotic mechanisms of some eumastacid grasshoppers from East Africa, Madagascar, India and South America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now clear that the genus Birodlo exhibits a considerable diversity of karyotypes. This, in itself, is a point of resemblance to the Morabinae and a point of difference from the eumastacid subfamilies Thericleinae and Pseudoschmidtiinae (White 1965(White , 1968(White , 1970, where the individual genera show much more karyotype uniformity, at least at the relatively superficial level of chromosome arms and their lengths (cryptic karyotypic differences, which could be revealed by modern Giemsa banding techniques, for example, may be extensive). At least 3 fusions or dissociations must be postulated to explain the differences in chromosome number between Biroella sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now clear that the genus Birodlo exhibits a considerable diversity of karyotypes. This, in itself, is a point of resemblance to the Morabinae and a point of difference from the eumastacid subfamilies Thericleinae and Pseudoschmidtiinae (White 1965(White , 1968(White , 1970, where the individual genera show much more karyotype uniformity, at least at the relatively superficial level of chromosome arms and their lengths (cryptic karyotypic differences, which could be revealed by modern Giemsa banding techniques, for example, may be extensive). At least 3 fusions or dissociations must be postulated to explain the differences in chromosome number between Biroella sp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%