2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Karyometry in the early detection and chemoprevention of intraepithelial lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In normal tissue, the height of each bar is f0.65, which is the typical mean absolute deviation in a Gaussian distribution. Tissues experiencing progression to cancer show marked increases in z value for numerous karyometric features (26).…”
Section: Karyometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In normal tissue, the height of each bar is f0.65, which is the typical mean absolute deviation in a Gaussian distribution. Tissues experiencing progression to cancer show marked increases in z value for numerous karyometric features (26).…”
Section: Karyometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progression to cancer is revealed as a positive skew in the lesion signature because progression is accompanied by increasing numbers of nuclei deviating notably from normal. The average nuclear abnormality, computed as the mean over the abnormality values of all nuclei in a sample from a given lesion, is a useful measure of lesion progression (16,26).…”
Section: Karyometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may define a fixed numerical value for a criterion and use, as a measure of agent efficacy, the proportion of nuclei or cases, which at the end of study have returned to below that value. One may also choose to take advantage of a progression curve and accept as evidence of agent efficacy the reduction of deviation from normal, in a given case, downward along the progression curve whether a fixed criterion value was reached at the end of the study or not (2). This latter measure is possibly more realistic and certainly more sensitive for a detection of efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ki-67 expression was low, as expected for postmenopausal women with benign disease [16,19]. Previous karyometric studies have shown early field effect changes [20,21]; therefore, very early changes revealed by karyometry might be seen here in compromised or at-risk cell clusters. At this point, it is also important to note that there may be a proportion of disrupted cells that show reduced or no Ki-67 expression, yet harbor significant genetic abnormalities as found in a study of in situ breast cancer cells by Man et al [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%