2008
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limits of Detection of Chemopreventive Efficacy: Karyometry of Skin Biopsies

Abstract: Objective: This study was designed to establish estimates of the smallest effects due to chemopreventive intervention detectable by karyometry in skin biopsies. Methods: Estimates of the smallest change of statistical significance and estimates of the power of the test were derived for several key features descriptive of the distribution of nuclear chromatin. Results from triplicate biopsies from the same case were used to provide estimates of the within-case, biopsy-to-biopsy variance. Results: Generally, a c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These negative biomarker results match those observed in our prior positive skin cancer chemoprevention studies of oral vitamin A and topical difluoromethylornithine (1820). On the other hand, karyometric analysis of nuclear chromatin abnormality in baseline and end-of-study sun-damaged skin once again has proven useful as an “integrating biomarker” of response to chemopreventive agent activity (13, 18–23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These negative biomarker results match those observed in our prior positive skin cancer chemoprevention studies of oral vitamin A and topical difluoromethylornithine (1820). On the other hand, karyometric analysis of nuclear chromatin abnormality in baseline and end-of-study sun-damaged skin once again has proven useful as an “integrating biomarker” of response to chemopreventive agent activity (13, 18–23).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Our study builds upon numerous earlier efforts that have applied digital nuclear morphometry to questions involving risk and prognosis in cancer of the breast [10], cervix [2], oropharynx/lung [11], colon [12], skin [13] and prostate. In the prostate, nuclear morphometry has been shown to detect abnormalities in benign tissue adjacent to cancer and HGPIN [14], [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%