2011
DOI: 10.1515/9783110267167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kant on Human Dignity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
37
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
37
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Why is it at all necessary to legally protect something that is impossible to take away or infringe upon? If human dignity is inalienable in a descriptive 29 Sensen (2011). 30 Pinker (2008).…”
Section: Human Dignity As a Concept: Two Dimensions Of Human Dignitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Why is it at all necessary to legally protect something that is impossible to take away or infringe upon? If human dignity is inalienable in a descriptive 29 Sensen (2011). 30 Pinker (2008).…”
Section: Human Dignity As a Concept: Two Dimensions Of Human Dignitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inseparability of this element and members of the human species is what makes humans exceptional and gives them 32 See Killmister (2010). 33 Sensen (2011) also used the distinction between the term »initial« and »realised« dignity to explain differences between the traditional and modern paradigms of the human dignity concept (see also Giesinger (2012), pp. 609-620).…”
Section: Human Dignity As a Concept: Two Dimensions Of Human Dignitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, the point is made that the concept of human dignity consists of two dimensions, initial and realised dignity. This idea has emerged more markedly in recent years and so has to be taken into consideration when discussing topics that relate to human dignity (Schroeder, 2010;Sensen, 2011;Formosa & Mackenzie, 2014;Neuhauser & Stoecker, 2014). The main advantage of this theoretical model is that it can be used widely, with some adjustments, in different cultural contexts and circumstances.…”
Section: The Foundation Of Democratic Political Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stating that someone has lost their dignity, the dignity being referred to is realised dignity. Similarly, dignified behaviour also refers to realised dignity and characterises behaviour corresponding to a subject endowed with initial dignity (Sensen, 2011). Realised dignity consists of two elements that are both necessary to fully encapsulate it:  person's relation to oneself (self-respect) and  person's relation to a fellow human being (and vice versa).…”
Section: The Foundation Of Democratic Political Culturementioning
confidence: 99%