“…Carbon materials usually exhibit lower catalytic activity than metal catalysts and must operate at relatively high temperatures of around 800-1100°C to achieve good hydrogen yields [116]. Nevertheless, carbon catalysts show important advantages that overcome the problems attributed to metal catalysts [17,20,117]: -lower cost -higher resistance to temperature and better stability -safe storage of the carbon product due to non-toxicity -tolerance to impurities, e.g., sulfur resistance -no contamination of the carbon by-product with metal particles -mitigation of CO 2 emissions (unlike metal catalysts: the regeneration of metal catalysts by burning the carbon accumulated on the catalyst surface produces significant amounts of CO x ) -the produced carbon may also have some catalytic effects -no need for catalyst regeneration Different carbon materials have been investigated for the thermal decomposition of methane: activated carbon (AC), carbon black (CB), glassy carbon, acetylene black, graphite (graph), diamond powder, coal char, fullerene soot, fullerenes C 60/70 , carbon nanotubes, and ordered mesoporous carbons (CMK materials). According to their crystallinity, carbon materials are classified into highly ordered (graphite and diamond), less ordered (turbostratic and pyrolytic carbon, such as glassy carbon, fullerene soot, fullerenes C 60/70 , carbon nanotubes, and CMK materials), and disordered (amorphous, microcrystalline, such as activated carbon, carbon black, coal char, and acetylene black) carbons [23,79].…”