2015
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K2 Variable Catalogue: Variable stars and eclipsing binaries in K2 campaigns 1 and 0

Abstract: Aims. We have created a catalogue of variable stars found from a search of the publicly available K2 mission data from Campaigns 1 and 0. This catalogue provides the identifiers of 8395 variable stars, including 199 candidate eclipsing binaries with periods up to 60 d and 3871 periodic or quasi-periodic objects, with periods up to 20 d for Campaign 1 and 15 d for Campaign 0. Methods. Lightcurves are extracted and detrended from the available data. These are searched using a combination of algorithmic and human… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
106
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
106
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to a major source of systematic noise in the lightcurve , the removal of which is the key part of our detrending method. The full method is explained in Armstrong et al (2015), but is summarised here for clarity. Initially a fixed aperture, of radius 4 pixels in this case and shape as described in Armstrong et al (2015), was centred on the brightest target pixel.…”
Section: K2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to a major source of systematic noise in the lightcurve , the removal of which is the key part of our detrending method. The full method is explained in Armstrong et al (2015), but is summarised here for clarity. Initially a fixed aperture, of radius 4 pixels in this case and shape as described in Armstrong et al (2015), was centred on the brightest target pixel.…”
Section: K2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The motion of the centroids is then fit with a polynomial and transformed into a single parameter that relates spacecraft motion to flux variations, which is then used to de-trend the data. Similar methods are employed in the K2VARCAT pipeline (Armstrong et al 2015), developed specifically for variable K2 stars, the K2P 2 pipeline (Lund et al 2015), which uses an intelligent clustering algorithm to define custom apertures, and in the pipeline of Huang et al (2015), which employs astrometric solutions to the motion of K2 targets, determining the X and Y motion of a target from the behavior of multiple stars on the same spacecraft module. Finally, the K2SC pipeline (Aigrain et al 2015(Aigrain et al , 2016 and the pipeline of Crossfield et al (2015) both employ a Gaussian process (GP) to remove instrumental noise, using the X and Y coordinates of the target star as the regressors to derive a model for the instrumental systematics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To correct these systematics in the K2 data, several methods have been developed, all presenting two main steps: a photometric extraction with a variety of aperture shapes and positions and a "correction of systematics". Vanderburg & Johnson (2014) and later on Armstrong et al (2015) used normal aperture photometry and corrected the systematics decorrelating the flux and the position variations of the target on the CCD. However, while Vanderburg & Johnson (2014) used the fact that the main motion of the line of sight was along one direction (the roll direction), which reduced the decorrelation to 1D, Armstrong et al (2015) opted for a 2D decorrelation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%