2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1026116916580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

k0-NAA quality assessment by analysis of different certified reference materials using the KAYZERO/SOLCOI software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For QA/QC purposes, the NIST SRM-1567a Wheat Flour was used (Table 1). The method used is described in detail elsewhere (Jaćimović et al 2003). Uncertainty is given with a coverage factor k = 1 for data obtained by k 0 -INAA, while for NIST SRM-1567a uncertainty is given with k = 2 for certified values Differences in element concentrations were examined using Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test, using Statistica Statsoft (version 8.0), and significant differences were considered for P < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For QA/QC purposes, the NIST SRM-1567a Wheat Flour was used (Table 1). The method used is described in detail elsewhere (Jaćimović et al 2003). Uncertainty is given with a coverage factor k = 1 for data obtained by k 0 -INAA, while for NIST SRM-1567a uncertainty is given with k = 2 for certified values Differences in element concentrations were examined using Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) test, using Statistica Statsoft (version 8.0), and significant differences were considered for P < 0.05.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the k 0 -standarization method it is generally accepted that an overall uncertainty in most cases is around 4% [22]. Based on our knowledge and experience obtained during the k 0 -method assessment process at the Jožef Stefan Institute, when applying KAYZERO/SOLCOI software, we used 3.5%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For determination of f (thermal to epithermal flux ratio) and α (parameter which measures the epithermal flux deviation from the ideal 1/E distribution), the "Cd-ratio" method for multi monitor was applied [22]. The values f = 28.8 and α = −0.005 were used to calculate the elemental concentrations.…”
Section: K 0 -Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For peak area evaluation, the HyperLab [36] program was used. For determination of f (thermal to epithermal neutron flux ratio) and a (parameter which measures the epithermal neutron flux deviation from the ideal 1/E distribution), the ''Cdratio'' method for multi monitor was applied [37]. The values f = 28.6 and a = -0.001 were used to calculate the element concentrations.…”
Section: Determination Of 238 U and 226 Ra In Plants And Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%