1987
DOI: 10.1016/0166-8641(87)90012-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

K-theory for spherical space forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, f * is a surjection on the infinity page by the naturality of the AHSS. It follows that f * : K(X) → K(S m ) is surjective (for the case when X is a spherical space form, this follows from [23], Theorem 1-(b)). Hence, we have the following remark: Remark 3.9.…”
Section: Proof Assume Q /mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, f * is a surjection on the infinity page by the naturality of the AHSS. It follows that f * : K(X) → K(S m ) is surjective (for the case when X is a spherical space form, this follows from [23], Theorem 1-(b)). Hence, we have the following remark: Remark 3.9.…”
Section: Proof Assume Q /mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…By an argument as in [34] Theorem 7.26, the diagram commutes up to homotopy. It is well-known that ϕ induces a surjection on K (see for example [23]). Thereby, inner automorphisms of π induce identity on K(X) as well.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation