1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01162239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The eta invariant and $$\tilde K$$ O of lens spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let res : C(B) → C(S m−1 ) denote the restriction map. We then obtain a map It is shown in [2] (see also [26,Theorem 0.1]) that this map is surjective. Using the bundle structure of C(B) ⋊ G ∼ = C(B ⋊ G M n (C)), this map can be described as follows: First of all consider C(B ⋊ G M n (C)) as a bundle over [0, 1] with fibre C * (G) ∼ = M n (C) G at 0 and fibre C(S m−1 ) ⋊ G ∼ = C(S m−1 × G M n (C)) at every t = 0.…”
Section: P 132]) Its Inverse Indmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let res : C(B) → C(S m−1 ) denote the restriction map. We then obtain a map It is shown in [2] (see also [26,Theorem 0.1]) that this map is surjective. Using the bundle structure of C(B) ⋊ G ∼ = C(B ⋊ G M n (C)), this map can be described as follows: First of all consider C(B ⋊ G M n (C)) as a bundle over [0, 1] with fibre C * (G) ∼ = M n (C) G at 0 and fibre C(S m−1 ) ⋊ G ∼ = C(S m−1 × G M n (C)) at every t = 0.…”
Section: P 132]) Its Inverse Indmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the existence of a trivialization together with surjectivity of the map res * in (5.23) would imply that K 0 (G\S m−1 ) ∼ = Z • 1 G\S m−1 . But one can see in the appendix of [26] that K 0 (G\S m−1 ) := K 0 (G\S m−1 )/Z • 1 G\S m−1 is non-trivial (of finite order) for many choices of groups Z n acting on a suitable R m . For instance: if m = 4 and n = 2, we get K 0 (G\S 3 ) ∼ = Z/2.…”
Section: P 132]) Its Inverse Indmentioning
confidence: 99%